The Dialect of Hasawis and Bedouins in Al-Ahsa (Saudi Arabia): A Comparative Study
Introduction. This paper is a sociolinguistic study that aims to investigate the speech of two groups in Al-Ahsa (Saudi Arabia) for the purpose of making a comparison between their speech.
Methods. This study is empirical in its methods in that it is fully dependent on naturalistic speech. All the interviews, which were conducted in Al-Ahsa were conducted using the face-to-face technique for obtaining data with regard to linguistic variation. In this, the focus is on the Hasawi people and the Bedouins.
Results. The study indicates that these two groups manipulate their dialect, in particular the key features of their dialects, to emphasize distinctiveness and negotiate identity. The study shows that while the linguistic behavior of the elderly in both groups is similar both within and outside of the group, the young generations show differences in their speech behavior. Additionally, group identity is very important to them. Outside the group, the possibility of interacting with members of the other group occurs, and, within this context, strong correlations appeared between linguistic factors and social factors, in particular the group identity among young males and gender distinctness among young females in both groups. Young males stereotypically tend to use the local linguistic forms, in particular the forms that are considered "the most salient feature which carries the social meaning of locality (Al-Wer, 1991: 75) and symbolizes local identities. The linguistic behavior of young males in both groups exhibits almost the same trends. Both are proud of the identity of the group to which they belong, particularly in gatherings in which other identities are present. Thus, unlike the two other age groups, the use of the /ts/ by the young Bedouin males and the use of the /EL/ by Hasawi young males increase in these settings rather than inside their own groups. This indicates that displaying one’s group identity is of significance to the young males in each group when a possible interaction takes place. While the use of the /EL/ among young Hasawis inside the group is 55.0%, its use was 70.0% in contexts outside the group and in the presence of other identities. The use of the /ts/ variant inside the group is 40%, while it is 60.0% outside the group. It also shows that the linguistic behavior of the Hisawi elderly is almost identical to the linguistic behavior of the elderly in the Bedouin group. In both groups, age (young, middle-aged or elderly) appears to be significant.
Conclusion. The study shows that social competition is primarily expressed in the linguistic forms used. The more this social competition increases, the more unlikely the possibility of giving up one's social dialect becomes. People say much more through an accent than through the semantic content of the speech itself. To conclude, the study shows that social competition is frequently expressed in the linguistic forms used.
Abdel-Jawad, H. (1981). Lexical and Phonological Variation in Spoken Arabic in Amman [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Pennsylvania.
Akhter, I. (2014). Differences in language use by male and female students in tertiary academia in Dhaka city [Unpublished B.A Thesis]. BRAC University. URL: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/61805474.pdf
Al Jumah, A. (2008). The syllable shape of Al-Ahsa dialect: An OT perspective. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 44(2), 155–177. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10010-008-0009-8
Al Khatib, M. (1988). Sociolinguistic change in an expanding urban context. A case study of Irbid city, Jordan [Unpublished PhD Thesis]. University of Durham. URL: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/1696/1/1696.pdf?EThOS%20(BL)
Al Mahmoud, M.A. (2012). Saudi University students' attitude towards the use of Arabic and English: implications for language planning [Unpublished PhD Thesis]. Macquarie University. URL: file:///C:/Users/0C16~1/AppData/Local/Temp/01whole.pdf.pdf
Al-Jehani, N. (1985). Sociostylistic stratification of Arabic in Makkah [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Michigan.
Al-Wer, E. (1991). Phonological variation in the speech of women from three urban areas in Jordan [Unpublished PhD Thesis]. University of Essex.
Butragueño, P.-M. (2020). An approach to subject pronoun expression patterns in data from the “Project for the Sociolinguistic Study of Spanish in Spain and America”. In Isabel Molina Martos, Florentino Paredes García, & Ana M. Cestero (Eds.), Mancera Spanish in Context. (Vol. 17, Issue 2, pp. 294–316). https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.00060.mar
Daher, J. (1998). Gender In linguistic variation: The variable (Q) in Damascus Arabic. In E. Benmamoun, M. Eid, & N. Haeri (Eds), Perspectives on Arabic linguistics. (Vol. XI, pp. 183–205). Benjamins Publishing Company.
Eckert, P. (1997). Age as a sociolinguistic variable. In F. Coulmas (Ed), The Handbook of Sociolinguistics (pp.151–168). Blackwell.
El Salman, M., & Al Fridan, A. (2018). Emphatic and vowel lengthening and identity in the city of Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia. American Arab Academy foe Science and Technology, 9(13), 139–148
El Salman, M. (2016). The linguistic and social aspects of the Bedouin dialect. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7(4), 19–24. file:///C:/Users/Dell/Downloads/56996-208480-1-PB%20(2).pdf
El Salman, M., & Al Haisoni, E. (2013). Arabic dialect used in the Northern West of Saudi Arabia Shamari Arabic. Languages and Linguistics, 31, 47–57
Jenkins, E.M., Zaher, Z., Tikkanen, S.A., & Ford, J.L. (2019). Creative identity (re) Construction, creative community building, and creative resistance: A qualitative analysis of queer in-group members’ tweets after the Orlando Shooting. Computers in Human Behavior, 101, 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb. 2019.07.004
Labov, W. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. URL: https://web.stanford.edu/class/linguist62n/labov001.pdf
Lakoff, R.T. (1976). Language and Woman’s Place. Octagon Books. URL: https://web.stanford.edu/class/linguist156/Lakoff_1973.pdf
Le Page, R. (1997). The Evolution of a Sociolinguistic Theory of Language. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), The Handbook of Socio-linguistics (pp. 15–32). Oxford: Blackwell.
Mahmud, M. (2010). Language and gender in English language teaching. TEFLIN Journal, 21(2), 172–185. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v21i2/172-185
Mesthrie, R. (2000). Clearing the ground: basic issues, concepts and approaches. In R. Mesthrie, J. Swann, A. Deumert, & W. Leap (Eds.), Introducing Sociolinguistics (pp. 1–43). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Milroy, J., & Milroy, L. (1997). Varieties and variation. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), The Handbook of Sociolinguistics (pp.47–64). Blackwell.
Nakhlah (1980). Tariikh Al Ahasa Al siasi (1818–1913). Kuwait: That Al salasil Publisher.
Nemati, A., & Haddad, M. (2020). Construction and re-construction of identities: A study of learners’ personal and L2 identity. Cogent psychology, 7(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2020.1823635
Nemati, A., & Bayer, M. (2007). Gender Differences in the Use of Linguistic Forms in the Speech of Men and Women: A Comparative Study of Persian and English. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242268653_Gender_Differences_in_the_Use_of_Linguistic_Forms_in_the_Speech_of_Men_and_Women_A_Comparative_Study_of_Persian_and_English
Nematzadeh, Azadeh & Mehry, Haddad Narafshan (2020) Construction and re-construction of identities: A study of learners’ personal and L2 identity. Cogent Psychology, 7, 1: 1823635. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2020.1823635
Okombo, P. (2020). The age factor in linguistic variation: A reference to the use of Kiswahili at Busia border town in East Africa. Les Cahiers d’Afrique de l’Est / The East African Review, 55, 1–16.
Rovira, L. (2008). The Relationship Between Language and Identity. The Use of the Home Language as Aa Human Right of the Immigrant. Remhu – Revista Interdisciplinar da Mobilidade Humana, 16(31), 63–80.
Savchenko, O (2019). Psycholinguistic tools of self-Assessing Individual Reflectivity. East European Journal of Psycholinguistics, 6(2), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2019.6.2.sav
Subon, F. (2013). Use of Linguistic Forms in the Speech of Men and Women in the Malaysian Context. OSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 13(3), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-1336779
Terekhova, D. (2018). An Experimental Study of the Lingual Consciousness of Ukrainians and Russians (Dynamic Aspect). East European Journal of Psycholinguistics, 5(1), 92–110. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1436306
Thomason, S.G. (2008). Social and linguistic factors as predictors of contact-induced change. Journal of Language Contact, 2, 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1163/000000008792525381
Trudgill, P (1986). Dialects in contact. Oxford and New York: Basil Blackwell.
Trudgill, P. (1974). The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge University Press.
Verschik, A. (2015). Language contact, language awareness, and multilingualism. In J. Cenoz, D. Gorter, & S. May (Eds.), Language Awareness and Multilingualism. Encyclopedia of Language and Education (3rd ed.). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02325-0_21-1
Walters, K. (1991). Women, men, and linguistic variation in the Arab world. In B. Comrie, & M. Eid (Eds.), Perspectives on Arabic linguistics (Vol. III, pp. 197–229). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Watson, J. (1992). Kashkasha with reference to modern Yemani dialects. Zeitschrift für Arabische Linguistik, 24, 60–81.
Zasiekina, L. (2019). Psycholinguistic markers of autobiographical and traumatic memory. East European Journal of Psycholinguistics, 6(2), 119–133. https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2019.6.2.zas
Abstract views: 714 PDF Downloads: 312