Structural Types of English, French and Ukrainian Fish Names

  • Nataliia V. Shvets SHEE «Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi State Pedagogical University named after Hryhorii Skovoroda»
Keywords: cognitive onomasiological method, onomasiological structure, ichthyonym, derivative, compound

Abstract

The article is devoted to the identification of structural types of English, French and Ukrainian ichthyonyms based on the interpretation of their onomasiological structure. The four structural types of fish names in English, French and Ukrainian are established, they are derivatives, compounds, two-component and multi-component nouns. The most productive suffixes for forming derivatives are found out. The associative, distant-syntagmatic, contact-syntagmatic and integrated compound types are characterized. The structural models of two-component and multi-component nouns are identified. It is found out that structural differences between English, French and Ukrainian ichthyonyms are expressed by the productivity of different structural types of fish names in three languages (compounds prevail in English, multi-component nouns – in French, derivatives - in Ukrainian).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kubryakova, Ye.S. (1988). Slovoslozheniye kak protsess nominatsii i yego otlichitel'nyye formal'nyye i soderzhatel'nyye kharakteristiki [Composition as the nomination process and its distinctive formal and substantial characteristics]. Teoreticheskiye osnovy slovoslozheniya – Theoretical fundamentals of composition, (pp. 3-23). Pyatigorsk: PSPI [in Russian].
Kubryakova, Ye.S. (1997) Chasti rechi s kognitivnoy tochki zreniya [Parts of speech from the point of view of cognitive approach]. Moscow: Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Sciences [in Russian].
Selivanova, Ye.A. (2000) Kognitivnaya onomasiologiya [Cognitive onomasiology]. Kiev: Fitosotsiotsentr [in Russian].
Selivanova, O.O. (1996) Skladne slovo: movni modeli svitu (osnovy zistavnoyi kompozytolohiyi rosiysʹkoyi ta ukrayinsʹkoyi mov) [Compound words: linguistic world models (the fundamentals of comparative composition of Russian and Ukrainian)]. Cherkasy: TSNTI [in Ukrainian].
Selivanova, O.O. (2006) Suchasna linhvistyka: terminolohichna entsyklopediya [Linguistics: terminological encyclopedia]. Poltava: Dovkillya-K. [in Ukrainian].
Blank, A. (2001). Words and Concepts in Time : towards Diachronic Cognitive Onomasiology. Das online-Journal metaphorik.de., Vol. 1. – URL : http://www.metaphorik.de.
Dokulil, M. (1962). Tvoreni slov v cestine. Teorie odvozovani slov. – Praha : Nakladatelství Československé akademie věd. 264 s.
Koch, P. (2004). Diachronic cognitive onomasiology and semantic reconstruction. Lexical Data and Semantic Change, (pp. 79-106). In W. Mihatsch, R. Steinberg (Eds.). Tübingen : Stauffenburg.
Štekauer, P. & Lieber R. (2005). Onomasiological Approach to Word-formation. Handbook of Word-formation, (pp. 207-229). Dordrecht : Springer.

Abstract views: 34
PDF Downloads: 49
Published
2016-08-30
How to Cite
Shvets, N. V. (2016). Structural Types of English, French and Ukrainian Fish Names. PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, (20(2), 123-132. Retrieved from https://psycholing-journal.com/index.php/journal/article/view/118