Personal Qualities of M.S. Gorbachev and B.N. Yeltsin in Language Consciousness of Humanities Students
Abstract
Objectives. The study aims at identifying and describing a fragment of the linguistic consciousness of humanitarian students, reflecting their ideas about the personal qualities of M.S. Gorbachev and B.N. Yeltsin. The additional tasks are: (1) to compare the characteristics identified experimentally with the linguistic characteristics of these personalities in the official mass media; (2) to analyze the role of media discourse in the formation of images of the politicians under study.
Material and Methods. The method of unipolar personal semantic differential is used. The process of the results included the identification of group universal assessments, their qualitative analysis, comparison and qualitative analysis of the similarities and differences of the universal evaluations of the stimuli studied. Media texts published for the 90th anniversary of Gorbachev and the 90th anniversary of Yeltsin, selected by the method of random (serial) sampling, were analyzed qualitatively
Results. Group semantic universals reflecting students’ perceptions of the politicians studied are poor in content. The most striking characteristic of Gorbachev are selfishness and deceitfulness, unlike Yeltsin he is thought to be hardworking and calm. A distinctive feature of Yeltsin is ambition. Both leaders appear as free in their behavior, the difference lies in the fact that Gorbachev is considered experienced, but devoid of tact and flexibility, Yeltsin lacks creativity, wit and malevolence. Both combine such traits as sociability, activity and intelligence. The experiment does not record the qualities that are emphasized in mass media – kindness and care for the good of the country.
Conclusions. The ideas of students about the personal qualities of Gorbachev and Yeltsin are rather vague, “kaleidoscopic” in nature. The group assessment of the personal characteristics of these politicians does not coincide with the interpretation offered by various mass media. Mass media today do not contribute to the development of a view of the history shared by a significant part of society, which, in turn, leads to the conservation of socio-political contradictions in society. Moreover, modern media, despite its advantageous position, now play rather a destructive role in creating a common view of the history of Russia and the quality of its recent leaders. The result may be a state of psychological conflict in society directly related to culture and the human self, with “identification confusion” (the term of E. Erickson) that has the function of a collective ego.
Downloads
References
Artemyeva, E.Yu. (1999). Osnovy psihologii subektivnoj semantiki [Fundamentals of the Psychology of Subjective Semantics]. In I.B. Khaninoy (Ed.). Moscow: Nauka; Smysl [in Russian].
Bail, C.A. et al. (2018). Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization. Pnas, 115(37), 9216–9221. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804840115
Baudrillard, J. (2020). Obshhestvo potreblenija [Consumer Society]. Moscow : Izd-vo AST [in Russian].
Bernays, E. (2010). Propaganda [Propaganda]. In I. Yushchenko (Trans.). Moscow : Hippo Publishing [in Russian].
Blank, G., & Lutz, C. (2017). Representativeness of social media in Great Britain : Investigating Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, Pinterest, Google+, and Instagram. American Behavioral Scientist, 61, 741–756. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764217717559
Bubnova, I. (2021). Personal Qualities of the Leaders of Russia of the XXth Century (June 12, 2021). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3865736
Gruzd, A., Jacobson, J., & Wellman, B. (2017). Social Media and Society: Introduction to the Special Issue. American Behavioral Scientist, 61(7), 647–652. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764217717567
Gruzd, A., Jacobson, J., Wellman, B., & Mai, P.H. (2016). Understanding communities in an age of social media: The good, the bad, and the complicated. Information, Communication & Society, 19(9), 1187–1193. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1187195
Gruzd, A., & Wellman, B. (2014). Networked influence in social media: Introduction to the special issue. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(10), 1251–1259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764214527087
Harvey, D. (2007). Neoliberalism as Creative Destruction. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 610(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716206296780
Hendriks, F., & Jucks, R. (2020). Does Scientific Uncertainty in News Articles Affect Readers’ Trust and Decision-Making? Media and Communication, 8(2), 401. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.2824
Kolomiets, V.P. (2017). Sociologija massovoj kommunikacii v obshhestve kommunikacionnogo izobilija [Sociology of Mass Communication in a Society of Communication Abundance]. Sociologicheskie issledovanija –Sociological research, 6, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0132162517060010 [in Russian].
Leontiev, A.A. (1969). Jazyk, rech, rechevaja dejatelnost [Language, speech, speech]. Moscow : Prosveshhenie [in Russian].
Leontiev, A.A. (1972). K psihologii rechevogo vozdejstvija [To the psychology of speech impact]. Proceedings from TSAPE’ 72: Vsesojuznyj simpozium po psiholingvistike i teorii kommunikacii – The All-Union Symposium on Psycholinguistics and Communication Theory (Moscow, 1972) (pp. 28–41). Moscow : Akademija nauk SSSR. Institut jazykoznanija [in Russian].
Leontiev, A.A. (1983). Jazyk propagandy : socialno-psihologicheskij aspekt [The language of propaganda : socio-psychological aspect]. Jazyk kak sredstvo ideologicheskogo vozdejstvija – Language as a means of ideological influence (pp. 15 – 33). Moscow : Inion AN SSSR [in Russian].
Leontiev, A.N. (2004). Deiatelity. Soznaniye. Lichnost [Activity. Consciousness. Personality]. Moscow : Smysl; Academy [in Russian].
Levashov, V.K. (2018). Novye socialno-politicheskie protivorechija na puti dostizhenija ustojchivogo razvitija [New socio-political contradictions on the way to achieving sustainable development]. Sociologicheskie issledovanija –Sociological research, 12, 107–119. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250003174-4 [in Russian].
Lippman, W. (1966). Public Opinion. N. Y.
Mayweg-Paus, E., & Jucks, R. (2018). Conflicting Evidence or Conflicting Opinions? Two-Sided Expert Discussions Contribute to Experts’ Trustworthiness. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 37(2), 203–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X17716102
Ming Liu (2017). “Contesting the Cynicism of Neoliberalism”: A Corpus-Assisted Discourse Study of Press Representations of the Sino-US Currency Dispute. Journal of Language and Politics 16(2), 242–263. https://doi 10.1075/jlp.15010.li
McLuhan, G. (2018). Ponimanie media. Vneshniye rasshirenia cheloveka [Understanding Media. External extensions of man]. Moscow : Kuchkovo pole [in Russian].
Serkin, V.P. (2008). Metody psihologii subektivnoj semantiki i psihosemantiki [Psychology methods of subjective semantics and psychosemantics]. Moscow : Izd-vo PCHELA [in Russian].
Serr, M. (2016). Devochka s palchik [Girl with a finger]. Moscow : Ad Marginem Press [in Russian].
Shmelev, A.G., Pokhilko, V.I., & Kozlovskaya-Telnova, A.Yu. (1988). Praktikum po jeksperimentalnoj psihosemantike (tezaurus lichnostnyh chert) [Workshop on Experimental Psychosemantics (Traits Thesaurus)]. Moscow: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta [in Russian].
Vygotsky, L.S. (2004). Psihologija razvitija cheloveka [Psychology of human development]. Moscow: Izd-vo Smysl; Izd-vo Eksmo [in Russian].
Internet resources
VCIOM: dolja rossijan, negativno ocenivajushhih dejatelnost Gorbacheva, snizilas [VTsIOM: the share of Russians who negatively assess Gorbachev’s activities has decreased]. Retrieved from https://tass.ru/obschestvo/10815565
Opros: Gorbachev dumal o blage strany, no sovershal takticheskie proschety [Poll: Gorbachev thought about the good of the country, but made tactical mistakes]. Retrieved from https://rg.ru/2021/03/02/opros-gorbachev-dumal-o-blage-strany-no-sovershal-takticheskie-proschety.html
Put ot tanka do groba. Istorija Borisa Elcina v fotografijah – k ego 90-letiju [The path from tank to coffin. The story of Boris Yeltsin in photographs – to his 90th birthday]. Retrieved from https://360tv.ru/news/tekst/borisu-eltsinu-90/
“Chelovek s sobstvennym mneniem”. Vyskazyvanija o Mihaile Gorbacheve [“A man with his own opinion”. Statements about Mikhail Gorbachev]. Retrieved from https://tass.ru/info/10807011
Abstract views: 186 PDF Downloads: 89
Licensing terms ensure preservation of copyright, and the right of the journal to publish original scientific papers containing results of theoretical and experimental research works which are not currently subject to review for publication in other scientific edition, bulletin or jounals. All materials are spread on conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution International CC-BY, which allows other persons and institutions to recognize authorship of this work and its initial source as the journal. The Author shall transfer to the editorial board of the journal the right to spread the electronic version of the paper by all kinds of electronic means (placement at the official website of the journal, electronic databases, repositories, etc.).
- The intellectual property and copyright on the original content of all scientific contributions shall remain with the authors grant, in exchange for publication in the Journal, exclusive licensing of first publication, giving the Journal the right to produce and disseminate the contributions, whether collectively with other articles or individually, and in all media forms known or to come.
- The authors shall guarantee the originality of their material and shall not publish any text that would appear to contravene, in any way, the definition of originality as given in the intellectual property.
- Plagiarism and false or intentionally misleading declarations constitute behavior that is at odds with the ethics of scientific publication; as such, they are deemed unacceptable.
- No significant part of the article shall have been previously published either as an article or as a chapter, or be under consideration for publication elsewhere.
- If the authors intend to reproduce their article in other publications or for any other purpose and by any means, they must obtain the written authorization of the editorial board.
- Reproduction of extracts of publications is possible provided that the authors cite their source and have obtained explicit permission from the rights holders, which permission shall not be unduly withheld. Reference must be given to the title of the article, the journal, the author(s), date and place of publication. The journal reserves the right to apply reproduction rights.
Provided the paper is accepted for publication in the present journal, the Author shall sign the License Agreement and Provisions on a Conflict of interest. The originals copy of the License Agreement and Provisions on a Conflict of Interests (a scanned's copyes) is sent to the e-mail address of the Editorial Board of this journal - psycholing.journal@gmail.com
The Author shall reserve the right to use materials of the paper, without approval of the editorial board and the founders of this journal:
- fully or partially, for educational purposes;
- for writing their own dissertation papers;
- for preparation of theses, conference reports or presentations.
Place electronic copies of the paper (including the final electronic version downloaded from the official website) at:
- personal web resources of all Authors (websites, webpages, blogs, etc.);
- web resources of the institutions where the Authors are employed (including electronic institutional repositories);
- non-profit public access web resources (for example, arXiv.org).
In all cases, it is obligatory to have a bibliographic reference to the paper, or a hyperlink to its electronic copy placed at the official website of this journal.
We will endeavor to protect the rights of authors and will investigate claims of plagiarism or misuse of published articles. We also seek to protect the reputation of the journal. Submitted articles may therefore be checked with duplication-checking software. If an article is found to have plagiarized published work we reserve the right to take action including publishing a correction; retracting the article; or pursuing other procedural or legal remedies.
International Conference Website
