Traumatic Narrative in Psycholinguistic Study Dimension
The traumatic narrative as a raw material for theoretical and experimental research of traumatic memory is represented in the article. The traumatic and non-traumatic experience is differentiated in the article. Emotionally negative and positive life events are represented in autobiographical memory and expressed in the autobiographical narrative. The traumatic events are represented in traumatic memory and verbalized in the traumatic narrative. We report that stressful traumatic events as a part traumatic memory are in the mediating zone between autobiographical memory and PTSD. The propositional analysis is used as psycholinguistic methodology for traumatic memory research. Each propositional tree is divided into two subtrees: a context subtree and a fact subtree. Further fact is divided into agent (they, he/she/it) and predicate, represented by relation and object (patient). The context is explicated by time and place. Presupposing the great significance of the role of self and others in the positive, negative and traumatic life events, we differentiate internal (I, we) or external agents (they, he/she/it) and internal (me, us) or external (them, him/her objects (patients). The significant differences in propositional units and number of words in traumatic narratives vs. autobiographical narratives were revealed. It supports the idea of different ways of coding and representation of thee life events: emotionally negative, emotionally positive and stressful traumatic. Moreover it allows revealing the hot spots in the traumatic event and situation expressed by the most frequent propositional units and therefore optimizing the therapeutic process for PTSD treatment.
Anderson, J., & Bower, G.D. (1974). A propositional model of recognition memory. Memory and Cognition, 2 (3), 406–412.
American Psychiatric Association (2002). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Washington, DC.: American Psychiatric Association.
Bauer, P.J. (2015). A complementary process account of the development of childhood amnesia and a personal past complementary process. Psychological Review, 122 (2), 204–231.
Berntsen, D., & Rubin, D.C. (2002). Cultural life scripts structure recall from autobiographical memory. Memory and Cognition, 32 (3), 427–442.
Berntsen, D., Rubin, D.C., & Siegler, I.C. (2011). Two versions of life: emotionally negative and positive life events have different roles in the organization of life story and identity. Emotion, 11 (15), 1190–201.
Brewin, C.R. (2007). Autobiographical memory for trauma: Update on four controversies. Memory, 15 (3), 227–248.
Colman, A.M. (2003). A Dictionary of Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kubany, E.S, Haynes S.N., Leisen M.B., Owenes J.A., Kaplan A.S., Watson S.B., & Burns K. (2000). Development and preliminary validation of a brief broad-spectrum measure of trauma exposure: the traumatic life events questionnaire. Psychological Assessment, 12, 210–224.
Lorenzzoni, P.L., Silva, G.L.T., Poletto, M.P., & Kristensen, Ch.H. (2014). Autobiographical memory for stressful events, traumatic memory and posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review. Avancesen Psihologia Lationoamericana, 32 (3), 361–376.
Matos, M., & Pinto-Gouveia, J. (2010). Shame as a traumatic memory. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 17, 299–312. doi: 10.1002/cpp.659
Meichenbaum, D.A. (1994). Clinical Handbook for Assessing and Treating Adults with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Waterloo Institute Press.
Silva, da T.L.G., Donat, J.C., Lorenzonni, P.L., Souza, de L.K., Gauer, G. & Kristensen, Ch. H. (2016). Event centrality in trauma and PTSD: relations between event relevance and posttraumatic symptoms. Psicologia: Reflexão e Critica, 29–34.
Sotgiu, I., & Rusconi, M.L. (2014). Why autobiographical memories for traumatic and emotional events might differ: theoretical arguments and empirical evidence. The Journal of Psychology, 148 (5), 523–547.
Zasiekina, L. (2014). Psycholinguistic reorganization of individual traumatic memory. East European Journal of Psycholinguistics, 2, 87–94.
Abstract views: 156 PDF Downloads: 186
Copyright (c) 2018 Psycholinguistics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.