Predicting EFL Learners’ Susceptibility to Various Disfluency Types Based on Gender and Age
Abstract
The aim of the current study is to investigate the relationship of production of speech disfluencies in EFL learners based on gender and age through regression modeling. Gender and age have been examined to influence the production of disfluencies in both native and nonnative speakers so it’s an important issue since fluency and disfluency are crucial aspects of language learning, however, the influence of age and gender on disfluency remains a controversial issue with studies often producing conflicting results with one another.
Methods. This study took a new approach to this subject as we produced regression models which can predict the likelihood of production of each disfluency type based on speakers’ age and gender. In order to do this 40 Iranian advanced EFL learners (20 male, 20 female) in four age groups (youth 19–24, young adults 25–30, adults 31–44, and older adults 45+) took part in the study. Later semi-structured interviews with a variety of questions regarding different topics were conducted and participants’ responses were first recorded and then transcribed. The frequency of occurrence of each disfluency type in participants’ speech samples formed our data. This data was then used for our regression analysis.
Results. Our findings indicated that, while filled pauses are the most frequently produced disfluency in both genders and all age groups, female speakers are more likely to produce hesitations in their speech compared to male speakers. We also found out that, older adults are less likely to produce filled pauses in their speech compared to younger speakers. With Further analyses, we also investigated the likelihood of producing certain disfluency types over other ones based on age and gender and how this may help instructors.
Conclusions. Based on our findings, it can be concluded that all six types of disfluencies are produced by the Iranian EFL learners. Also, we found that, filled pauses, hesitations, and repetitions are by far the most frequently produced disfluency types by Iranian EFL learners, respectively.
Downloads
References
Acton, E.K. (2011). On gender differences in the distribution of um and uh. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 17(2). Article 2. Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1188&context=pwpl
Altıparmak, A., & Kuruoğlu, G. (2018). Gender and Speech Dısfluency Productıon: a Psycholınguıstıc Analysıs on Turkısh Speakers. Psycholinguistics, 24(2), 114–143. https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2018-24-1-114-143
Andrade, C.R.F., & Martins, V.O. (2011). Influence of gender and educational status on fluent adults’ speech fluency. Logopedia, Foniatría y Audiología, 31(2), 74–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0214-4603(11)70175-9
Blankenship, J., & Kay, C. (1964). Hesitation phenomena in English speech: A study in distribution. Word, 20, 360–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1964.11659828
Bortfeld, H., Leon, S.D., Bloom, J.E., Schober, M.F., & Brennan, S.E. (2001). Disfluency Rates in Conversation: Effects of Age, Relationship, Topic, Role, and Gender. Language and Speech, 44(2), 123–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309010440020101
Bulc, T., Hadzi, V. & Horga, D. (2010). Speech fluency: a result of oral language proficiency? Linguistica, 52(1), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.4312/linguistica.52.1.87-100
Butcher, A. (1981). Aspects of the speech pause: Phonetic correlates and communicative functions. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Christian Albrechts Universitat zu Kiel, Germany.
Christenfeld, N., & Creager, B. (1996). Anxiety, alcohol, aphasia, and ums. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 451–460. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.451
Cooper, W.E., & Paccia-Cooper, J. (1980). Syntax and Speech. Cambridge, Massachusetts, US: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674283947
Crystal, D. (1997). English as a global language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Duez, D. (1993). Acoustic correlates of subjective pauses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068155
Eklund, R. (2001). Prolongations: A dark horse in the disfluency stable. In R. Lickley (Ed.), Proceedings of DiSS’01 Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech: ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop (August 29–31, 2001) (pp. 5-8). University of Edinburgh.
Eklund, R. (2004). Disfluency in Swedish human‐human and human machine travel booking dialogues. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Linkoping, Sweden.
Ferreira, F. (1993). Creation of prosody during sentence production. Psychological Review, 100(2), 233–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.233
Fillmore, C.J, Kempler, D., & Wang, W.S.-Y. (1979). Individual differences in language ability and language behavior. New York, US: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-255950-1.50017-2
Finlayson, I.R. (2014). Testing the roles of disfluency and rate of speech in the coordination of conversation. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Queen Margaret University.
Frost, J. (2019). Regression Analysis an Intuitive Guide. Retrieved from https://www.amazon.co.uk/Regression-Analysis-Intuitive-Interpreting-Linear/dp/1735431184
Ghonsooly, B., & Hoseinpour, A. (2009). The effect of concept mapping on EFL speaking fluency. IJAL, 12(1), 87–115.
Johnson, W. (1961). Measurements of oral reading and speaking rate and disfluency of adult male and female stutterers and nonstutterers. Journal of Speech & Hearing Disorders. Monograph Supplement, 7, 1–20.
Kormos, J., & Dénes, M. (2004). Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners. System, 32(2), 145–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.01.001
Leeper, L.H., & Culatta, R. (1995). Speech fluency: effect of age, gender and context. Folia Phoniatr Logop, 47(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1159/000266337
Lennon, P. (1990). Investigating fluency in EFL: A quantitative approach. Language Learning, 40(3), 387-417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1990.tb00669.x
Lickley, R.J. (1994). Detecting disfluency in spontaneous speech. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Edinburg, UK.
Lickley, R.J. (2001). Dialogue moves and disfluency rates. In Proceedings of DiSS’01 Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech: ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop (August 29–31, 2001) (pp. 93-96). University of Edinburgh.
Maclay, H., & Osgood, C.E. (1959). Hesitation Phenomena in Spontaneous English Speech, WORD, 15(1), 19-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1959.11659682
Mahl, G.F. (1956). Disturbances and silences in the patient’s speech in psychotherapy. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 53(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047552
Manning, W.H., & Monte, K.L. (1981). Fluency breaks in older speakers: Implications for a model of stuttering throughout the life cycle. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 6(1), 35–48. http://doi.org/10.1016/0094-730x(81)90029-2
Marshall, R.C., & Cullinan, W.L. (1971). Effects of reward schedule changes on children’s speech fluency. Language & Speech, 14(4), 341–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383097101400403
Martin, R.R., & Hasbrouck, J.M. (1977). The effects of punishment schedule on disfluency rate. Language and Speech, 20(2), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383097702000204
Martin, R.R., & Rangaswamy, K. (1972). The effects of time-out from speaking on the disfluency rates of normal speakers. Language and Speech, 15(4), 358–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383097201500405
Meng, X., & Miller, P. (1995). Occupational segregation and its impact on gender wage discrimination in China’s rural industrial sector. Oxford Economic Papers, 47(1), 136–155. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a042157
Menyhárt, K. (2003). Age-dependent types and frequency of disfluencies. In R. Eklund (Ed.), Proceedings of DiSS’03 Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech (September 5–8, 2003) (pp. 45–48). Sweden: Gothenburg University.
Miller, T.A. (2010). Generative models of disfluency. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Minnesota, US.
Minavand, Amir Minavand. (2021). Speech dysfluency production rate (male/female) (age groups: 19–24, 25–30, 31–44, 45+). Mendeley Data, V1. https://doi.org/10.17632/hzjvrjsxyy.1
Nakatani, C.H., & Hirschberg, J. (1994). A corpus-based study of repair cues in spontaneous speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95(3), 1603–1616. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.408547
Namaziandost, E., Saray, A., & Esfahani, F. (2018). The effect of writing practice on improving speaking skill among pre-intermediate EFL learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(1), 1690–1697. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0812.16
Namaziandost, E., & Ahmadi, S. (2019). The Assessment of Oral Proficiency through Holistic and Analytic Techniques of Scoring: A Comparative Study. Applied Linguistics Research Journal, 3(2), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.14744/alrj.2019.83792
Nasri, M., & Biria, R. (2017). Integrating multiple and focused strategies for improving reading comprehension and l2 lexical development of Iranian intermediate EFL learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 6(1), 311–321. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.1p.311
Oviatt, S. (1995). Predicting spoken disfluencies during human-computer interaction. Computer Speech & Language, 9(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1006/csla.1995.0002
Palmer, P., & O’Connell, D. (2009). Research Corner: Regression Analysis for Prediction: Understanding the Process. Cardiopulmonary physical therapy journal, 20(3), 23–26. https://doi.org/10.1097/01823246-200920030-00004
Pedhazur, E.J. (1997). Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction (3rd ed.). New York, US: Harcourt Brace.
Redford, M.A. (2015). The handbook of speech production. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584156
Schnadt, M. (2009). Lexical influences on disfluency production. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
Shin, M., & Lee, K. (2017). Disfluency, speech rate, and communication attitude differences according to gender and age in adults who do not stutter. Communication Sciences & Disorders, 22(4), 794–805. https://doi.org/10.12963/csd.17431
Shriberg, E. (1994). Preliminaries to a theory of speech disfluencies. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Berkeley.
Siegel, G.M., Lenske, J., & Broen, P. (1969). Suppression of normal speech disfluencies through response cost. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2(4), 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.0803.245
Spector, L.C., & Mazzeo, M. (1980). Probit analysis and economic education. Journal of Economic Education, 11(2), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.2307/1182446
Stevens, G. (1992). The Social and Demographic Context of Language Use in the United States. American Sociological Review, 57(2), 171–185. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096203
Tabasi, S., Aslani, A., & Forotan, H., (2016). Prediction of energy consumption by using regression model. Computational Research Progress in Applied Science & Engineering, 2(3), 110–115. Retrieved from http://www.crpase.com/archive/CRPASE-2016-VOL%2002-ISSUE%2003-04.pdf
Tavakoli, P., & Skehan, P. (2005). Strategic planning, task structure, and performance testing. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and Task Performance in a Second Language (pp. 239–277). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.11.15tav
Yairi, E., & Clifton, N.F., Jr. (1972). Disfluent speech behavior of preschool children, high school seniors, and geriatric persons. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 15(4), 714–719. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.1504.714
Abstract views: 140 PDF Downloads: 59
Licensing terms ensure preservation of copyright, and the right of the journal to publish original scientific papers containing results of theoretical and experimental research works which are not currently subject to review for publication in other scientific edition, bulletin or jounals. All materials are spread on conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution International CC-BY, which allows other persons and institutions to recognize authorship of this work and its initial source as the journal. The Author shall transfer to the editorial board of the journal the right to spread the electronic version of the paper by all kinds of electronic means (placement at the official website of the journal, electronic databases, repositories, etc.).
- The intellectual property and copyright on the original content of all scientific contributions shall remain with the authors grant, in exchange for publication in the Journal, exclusive licensing of first publication, giving the Journal the right to produce and disseminate the contributions, whether collectively with other articles or individually, and in all media forms known or to come.
- The authors shall guarantee the originality of their material and shall not publish any text that would appear to contravene, in any way, the definition of originality as given in the intellectual property.
- Plagiarism and false or intentionally misleading declarations constitute behavior that is at odds with the ethics of scientific publication; as such, they are deemed unacceptable.
- No significant part of the article shall have been previously published either as an article or as a chapter, or be under consideration for publication elsewhere.
- If the authors intend to reproduce their article in other publications or for any other purpose and by any means, they must obtain the written authorization of the editorial board.
- Reproduction of extracts of publications is possible provided that the authors cite their source and have obtained explicit permission from the rights holders, which permission shall not be unduly withheld. Reference must be given to the title of the article, the journal, the author(s), date and place of publication. The journal reserves the right to apply reproduction rights.
Provided the paper is accepted for publication in the present journal, the Author shall sign the License Agreement and Provisions on a Conflict of interest. The originals copy of the License Agreement and Provisions on a Conflict of Interests (a scanned's copyes) is sent to the e-mail address of the Editorial Board of this journal - psycholing.journal@gmail.com
The Author shall reserve the right to use materials of the paper, without approval of the editorial board and the founders of this journal:
- fully or partially, for educational purposes;
- for writing their own dissertation papers;
- for preparation of theses, conference reports or presentations.
Place electronic copies of the paper (including the final electronic version downloaded from the official website) at:
- personal web resources of all Authors (websites, webpages, blogs, etc.);
- web resources of the institutions where the Authors are employed (including electronic institutional repositories);
- non-profit public access web resources (for example, arXiv.org).
In all cases, it is obligatory to have a bibliographic reference to the paper, or a hyperlink to its electronic copy placed at the official website of this journal.
We will endeavor to protect the rights of authors and will investigate claims of plagiarism or misuse of published articles. We also seek to protect the reputation of the journal. Submitted articles may therefore be checked with duplication-checking software. If an article is found to have plagiarized published work we reserve the right to take action including publishing a correction; retracting the article; or pursuing other procedural or legal remedies.
International Conference Website
