Psycholinguistic Aspects of the Semantic Field of the Concept “War” in Modern Media Space

Keywords: concept “war”, semantic field, extention and intention, mass-media, worldview, conflicts


This paper presents modern trends in the change of the semantic field of the concept “war”. Based on the analysis of mass media in Russia, Ukraine and the USA, we demonstrated the regularities and interdependences of the mass media content and changes in the conceptual worldview of the people that consume information. We underlined the link between the changes in the forms of international conflicts and the increase of the units contributing to the semantic field of the concept “war”. We analised how the information and communicative space effects the change of the conceptual (mental, cognitive) worldview of the public.

Analysis of the semantic compatibility of the features of the concept “war” in mass media has revealed that apart from the military and armament themes, it contains the semantic units related to informational and psychological tools of influence. In the result of the systematic application of the concept “war” in relation to such semantic units as “informational”, “psychological”, “cyber”, “hybrid”, “fake news”, “sanctions”, etc. there takes place a fixation of compatibility of new semantic units with the concept “war”.

The broadening of the extent of the concept occurred due to the addition of two objects: “informational virtual component” comprising informational and psychological spheres of influence as well as a «technological component”, on which the informational security of the state is based. Thus, the modern extent and intent of the concept “war” includes not only academic dictionary definitions, but also the definitions that refer to the involvement of tools and techniques aimed at the securing  an armless victory in the confrontation.

The findings of the research also demonstrated a certain difference in the development of the concept in Ukrainian, western and pro-Russian mass media. While “war” in the pro-Russian mass media is covered in connection with an open aggression accompanied by the use of weapons, this concept in Ukrainian and western mass media is used in relation to psychological and information influence.

Thus, at the current stage, the broadening of the extent of the concept "war" has taken place, which is interrelated with the expansion of the semantic field, and is reflected in the change in the conceptual picture of the world within this concept.


Download data is not yet available.


Akademichnyy tlumachnyy slovnyk [Academic Explanatory Dictionary]. (1970–1980). Retrieved from [in Ukrainian].
Cambridge dictionary. The definition of “war”. Retrieved from [in English].
de Saint-Laurent, C., & Brescó de Luna, I. (2017) Collective memory and social sciences in the post-truth era. Culture & Psychology, 23(2), 147–155. doi: 10.1177/1354067X17695769
Efremova, T.F. (2000). Novyj slovar russkogo jazyka. Tolkovo-slovoobrazovatelnyj [New Dictionary of Russian Language. Explanatory and word formation]. Moscow: Russian language [in Russian].
Entsyklopediya suchasnoyi Ukrainskoji movy [Ukrayiny Encyclopedia of modern Ukrainian]. Retrieved from [in Ukrainian].
Gerasina, V.L., Pogribna, I. O., & Polishchuk, etc. (2015). Encyclopedic Dictionary in Political Science. In M.P. Trebina (Ed.). Kharkiv: Law [in Ukrainian].
J. de Keersmaecker, & Roets, A. (2017). ‘Fake news’: Incorrect, but hard to correct. The role of cognitive ability on the impact of false information on social impressions. Intelligence, 65, 107–110. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2017.10.005
Horbulin, V. (2017). Svitova hibrydna viyna: ukrayinskyy front [World hybrid war: Ukrainian front]. Kharkiv: Folio [in Ukrainian].
Dorogoju do referendumu: shho naspravdі dumajut pro Ukraїnu v Nіderlandah [On the way to the referendum: what is really thinking about Ukraine in the Netherlands] (n.d.). Retrieved from [in Ukrainian–English].
Kibrik, A.E. (1994). Kognitivnye issledovaniia po diskursu [Cognitive research on discourse]. Voprjsy yazykoznaniia – Questions of Linguistics, 5, 126–140 [in Russian].
Kolodiy, A. (2016). Pro konstsiyentalnu viynu i tverezyy hluzd u stavlenni do vlady [On the Conscience War and the sober mind in relation to power]. Retrieved from [in Ukrainian].
Kovalev, N.A. (2017). Evoliutsiia kontsepta kholodnaia voina v politicheskom diskurse na materiale SMI USA [Evolution of the Cold War concept in political discourse (based on USA media). Kommunikatsiia v politike biznese i obrazovanii: materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii 17-19 maya – Communication in politics, business and education: materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference (May 17-19, Moscow). (pp. 49–51). Moscow : Izdatelstvo Moskovskogo universiteta. Retrieved from [in Russian].
Kubriakova, E.S. (1994). Tekst i ego ponimanie [The text and its understanding]. Russkii tekst – Russian text, 2, 18–27 [in Russian].
Kubriakova, E.S., & Aleksandrova, O.V. (1999). O konturakh novoi paradigmy znaniia v lingvistike [On the contours of the new paradigm of knowledge in linguistics]. Doklady VII mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii «Struktura i semantika hudozhestvennogo teksta» – the reports of VII international conference «The structure and semantics of the artistic text». (pp. 186–197). Moscow [in Russian].
Lakoff, G. (1991). Metaphor and War: The Metaphor System Used to Justify War in the Gulf Peace. Journal of Urban and Cultural Studies, 2 (1).
Monitorynhovyy proekt «Oko». Richnyy monitorynhovyy zvit «Ukrayina v onlayn-media svitu za 2016 rik» [Monitoring project «Eye». Annual monitoring report «Ukraine in the online media world in 2016»] (n.d.) (2017). Retrieved from
Petrov, M.K. (1991). Yazyk. Znak. Kultura [Language. Knowledge. Culture]. Moscow: Editorial URSS [in Russian].
Politzer, G. (1986). Laws of language use and formal logic. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 15 (1), 47–92. doi: 10.1007/BF01067391
Pocheptsov, G. (2018). Media i voina: kak novye media sozdaiut novye tipy voiny [Media and war: how new media create new types of war]. Retrieved from [in Rusian].
Scott, Bennett D.,‎ & Stam, A. (2004). The Behavioral Origins of War. The University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.3998/mpub.23490
SOF Support to Political Warfare, United States Army Special Operations Command White Paper, Final (10 March, 2015). Retrieved from
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy The classical theory. Retrieved from
Thaler, R.H., & Cass, R. Sunstein (2009). Nudge. Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Penguin Books. Revised & Expanded edition.
Trebina, M.P., & Herasina L.M. (2015). Politolohichnyy entsyklopedychnyy slovnyk [Politology Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Kharkiv : Pravo [in Ukrainian].
The Collins word of the year (2017). Retrieved from
Tvitter vojny – Socialnye media i voennoe osveshhenie v Ukraine [Tweeting the war – Social Media and War Coverage in Ukraine] (2015). Retrieved from [in Ukrainian].

Abstract views: 3149
PDF Downloads: 186
How to Cite
Krylova-Grek, Y. (2018). Psycholinguistic Aspects of the Semantic Field of the Concept “War” in Modern Media Space. PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, (23(1), 175-188.