In Pursuit of the Functional Definition of a Mind: The Inevitability of the Language Ontology

Keywords: mind, functional definition, natural language processing, ontology of language, artificial intelligence, system, genesis, structural ontology

Abstract

In this article, the results of conceptualization of the definition of mind as an object of interdisciplinary applied research are described. The purpose of the theoretical analysis is to generate a methodological discourse suitable for a functional understanding of the mind in the context of the problem of natural language processing as one of the components of developments in the field of artificial intelligence. The conceptual discourse was realized with the help of the author's method of structural-ontological analysis, and developed in the mainstream of the system-methodological tradition of the school of G.P. Shchedrovitsky and intended for descriptive research of subject areas of interdisciplinary objects of scientific study. As a result of the structural and ontological analysis of the super-system, the relevant place and role of the directly studied system (mind) are determined, and its primary process and material are localized and structural and functional connections are described. At the basic level, the mind is conceptualized as an energy process unfolding in a spatio-temporal environment and accompanied by archetypal structuring of neural impulses into images. The genesis of the system is separately analyzed by constructing a structural-ontological matrix that reflects the initial stage of the development of the mind. The primary process is concretized with the help of hetero- and homeostatic dichotomy, and also the most significant features of the consistent transformation of the material of the system and its ascent to verbal morphology are described. The structural-ontological comparison of the functioning of the verbal intelligence with the preverbal level has been carried out. The transformation of neural impulses of needs into words, as verbal units fixing semiotic values is analyzed. Structural-ontological connections that determine the reactive and prospective characteristics of the functioning of the system are disclosed. The position of the chronological primacy of "semiotic readiness" for language with respect to the debut of the latter as an information-sign model of the environment is argued. The hypothesis of domination at the initial stage of the development of the mind of exopsychic functions over endopsychic ones is formulated. The theoretical substantiation of the hypothesis of the inevitability of the ontology of language in the functional understanding of the mind is given, corresponding structural and ontological arguments are given, including those based on the ideas about the information relationship between affects and needs, according to the views of P.V. Simonov. The arguments are presented in favor of the non-alternative methodology of A. Turing in studies of artificial intelligence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bartol, T.M., Bromer, C., Kinney, J., Chirillo, M.A., Bourne, J.N., Harris, K.M., & Sejnowski, T.J. (2015). Nanoconnectomic upper bound on the variability of synaptic plasticity. eLife, 4 (NOVEMBER 2015), [e10778]. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10778
Båve, A. (2017). Self-Consciousness and Reductive Functionalism. Philosophical Quarterly, 67(266), 1–21. Phil Archive copy v2: https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqw029
Bealer, G. (1984). Mind and anti-mind: Why thinking has no functional definition. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 9 (1), 283–328. Phil Archive copy v2: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4975.1984.tb00065.x
Bealer, G. (2001). The self-consciousness argument: Why Tooley's criticisms fail. Philosophical Studies, 105 (3), 281–307. Phil Archive copy v2: URL: https://philarchive.org/archive/BEATSA-2v2
Bridgman, P.W. (1937). Dimensional analysis. Yale Univ. Press.
Cannon, W.B. (1932). The wisdom of the body. New York, W.W. Norton & Company, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000441-193212000-00028
Endicott, R.P. (2011). Flat Versus Dimensioned: the What and the How of Functional Realization. Journal of Philosophical Research, 36, 191–208. PhilArchive copy v3: https://doi.org/10.5840/jpr_2011_13
Freud, S. (1961). The ego and the id. In J. Strachey (Ed. and Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, 19 (pp. 3–66). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1923)
https://doi.org/10.1097/00000441-196111000-00027
Furnham, A. (2008). 50 psychology ideas you really need to know. London, UK: Quercus Books.
Gillett, C. (2002). The dimensions of realization: a critique of the Standard view, Analysis, 62(4), 316–323, https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/62.4.316
Hawking, S. (1988). A Brief History of Time. Bantam Books. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2811637
Hawley, J.F., & Holcomb, K.A. (2005). Foundations of Modern Cosmology. OUP Oxford.
Jung, C.G. (1923). Psychological types; or, The psychology of individuation. London: Paul, Trench, Trubner.
Jung, C.G. (1981). The Archetypes and The Collective Unconscious, Collected Works, 9 (1) (2 ed.), Princeton, NJ: Bollingen.
Lacan, J. ([1953] 2006). The Function and Field of Speech and Language in Psychoanalysis. In Lacan, J. (ed.). Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English (translated with notes by B. Fink in collaboration with H. Fink and R. Grigg), pp. 237–68. New York: Norton.
Legg, S., & Hutter, M. (2007).A collection of definitions of intelligence. In Ben Goertzel, Pei Wang (ed.), Advances in Artificial General Intelligence: Concepts, Architectures and Algorithms (Vol. 157), (pp. 17–24). IOS Press, UK.
Leontev, A.N. (1978). Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. Prentice-Hall, Retrieved from https://www.marxists.org/archive/leontev/works/1978/index.htm
Levin, J. (2017). Functionalism, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/functionalism/
McWilliams, N. (2011). Psychoanalytic Diagnosis. Guilford Press, New York.
Piaget, J. (1926). The Language and Thought of the Child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Piaget, J. (1928). The Child's Conception of the World. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Piaget, J. (1952). The Origins of Intelligence in Children. New York: International University Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/11494-000
Rubinstein, S.L. (1957). Bytie i soznanie. O meste psihicheskogo vo vseobshhej vzaimosvjazi javlenij materialnogo mira [Existence and Consciousness. On the place of the psychic in the universal interconnection of the phenomena of the material world]. Moscow: Publishing House of the USSR Academy of Sciences [in Russian].
Russell, S.J., & Norvig, P. (2010). Artificial intelligence: a modern approach (3 rd ed.), Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Searle, J.R. (2004). Mind: A Brief Introduction. Oxford University Press, Philosophy.
Sedov, L.I. (1959). Metody podobija i razmernosti v mehanike. Poisk informacii. [Similarity and dimensional methods in mechanics. Info search]. Moscow [in Russian].
Selye, H. (1974). Stress Without Distress. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott Co.
Scheck, F. (2013).Quantum Physics. Springer Science & Business Media, Apr. 17, 2007 – Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34563-0
Shchedrovitzky, G.P. (1966). Methodological problems of system research. General Systems, XI. Translated by A. Rapoport.
Shchedrovitsky, G.P. (1982) Methodological organization of systems-structural research and development: principles and general framework. General Systems, XXVII. Translated by A. Rapoport
Shchedrovitsky, G.P. (1995). Izbrannye trudy [Selected Works]. Moscow: School of Cultural Politics [in Russian].
Shymko, V.A. (2016). Systemic localisation of the object in psychological research: structural and ontological visualization. Vіsnik Kiїvskogo nacіonalnogo unіversitetu іmenі Tarasa Shevchenka – Bulletin of Kiev Taras Shevchenko University, 1 (34), 47–51. http://miljournals.knu.ua/index.php/visnuk/article/viewFile/19/15 [in Ukrainian].
Shymko, V.A. (2018). Object field of organizational culture: methodological conceptualization. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 26 (4). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-03-2017-1135
Sidharth, B.G. (2010). When the Universe Took a U-turn. World Scientific. Philosophy.
Simonov, P.V. (1991). Motivated Brain a Neurophysiological Analysis of Human Behavior. Monographs in Psychobiology. Publisher: Routledge.
Turing, A. (1950). Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind, 49, 433–460.https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433
Vasilyuk, F. (1991). The Psychology of Experiencing. Publisher: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Wudka, J. (2006). Space-Time, Relativity, and Cosmology. Cambridge University Press. Science.
Yampolskiy, R.V. (2013) Turing Test as a Defining Feature of AI-Completeness. In X.S. Yang (ed.), Artificial Intelligence, Evolutionary Computing and Metaheuristics. Studies in Computational Intelligence (Vol. 427). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Abstract views: 2049
PDF Downloads: 209 PDF Downloads: 273
Published
2018-04-12
How to Cite
Shymko, V. (2018). In Pursuit of the Functional Definition of a Mind: The Inevitability of the Language Ontology. PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, (23(1), 327-346. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1211593