Gender and Speech Dısfluency Productıon: a Psycholınguıstıc Analysıs on Turkısh Speakers

Keywords: Psycholinguistics; speech production; gender; Turkish speech; speech disfluencies


The aim of this study is to analyze the influence of gender on fluent Turkish native speakers' speech disfluency production rates. Totally 84 participants from four different age groups (4-8, 18-27, 33-50 and over 50) took part in the study. Gender distribution was equal in each group. In a corpus of face to face interviews, the prepared and impromptu speech samples of at least 300 words from each participant were analyzed. As a result, in the prepared speech situation 18-23-year-old males produced more prolongations than females, and 33-50-year-old males produced more prolongations, false starts and slips of the tongue (SOT) than females in the same age group. In impromptu speech situation, 18-23-year-old males produced more hesitations, prolongations, false starts and slips of the tongue than females, and 33-50-year-old males produced more prolongations and false starts than females in the same age group. Further analyses pointed out various findings related to the position of disfluencies in an utterance and the linguistic units involved in disfluency production.


Download data is not yet available.


Acton, E.K. (2011). On gender differences in the distribution of um and uh. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 17(2), 1–9.

Ambrose, N.G., & Yairi, E. (1999). Normative disfl uency data for early childhood stuttering. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 895–909.

Andrade, C.R.F., & Martins, V.O. (2011). Infl uence of gender and educational status on fl uent adults’ speech fl uency. Logopedia, Foniatria y Audiologia, 31(2), 74–81.

Bard, E.G., Lickley, R.J., & Aylett, M.P. (2001). Is disfl uency just diffi culty? In Proceedings of Disfl uency in Spontaneous Speech (DiSS’01), ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop (ITRW) on Disfl uency in Spontaneous Speech (pp. 97–100). Edinburgh, Scotland, UK. 29–31 August 2001.

Bear, J., Dowding, J., Shriberg, E., & Price, P. (1993). A system for labeling selfrepairs in speech. Technical Note 522. SRI International.

Beattie, G.W. & Butterworth, B.L. (1979). Contextual probability and word frequency as determinants of pauses and errors in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech, 22(3), 201–211.

Binnenpoorte, D., Van Bael, C., den Os, E., & Boves, L. (2005). Gender in everyday speech and language: A corpus-based study. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2005 (pp. 2213–2216). Lisbon, Portugal. 4–8 September 2005.

Bock, K. (1991). A sketchbook of production problems. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20(3), 141–160.

Boomer, D.S., & Dittmann, A.T. (1962). Hesitation pauses and juncture pauses in speech. Language and Speech, 5(4), 215–220 DOI: 10.1177/002383096200500404

Bortfeld, H., Leon, S.D., Bloom, J.E., Schober, M.F., & Brennan, S.E. (2001). Disfl uency rates in conversation: effects of age, relationship, topic, role, and gender. Language and Speech, 44(2), 123–147 DOI: 10.1177/00238309010440020101

Branigan, H., Lickley, R., & McKelvie, D. (1999). Non-linguistic infl uences on rates of disfl uency in spontaneous speech. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 387–390). San Francisco.

Butterworth, B. (1975). Hesitation and semantic planning in speech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 4(1), 75–87.

Carroll, D.W. (2008). Psychology of language. Melbourne : Thomson/Wadsworth. Christenfeld, N., & Creager, B. (1996). Anxiety, alcohol, aphasia, and ums. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 451–460.

Dell, G.S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93(3), 283–321. PMID:3749399

Den, Y. (2003). Some strategies in prolonging speech segments in spontaneous Japanese. In Proceedings of DiSS’03, Disfl uency in Spontaneous Speech Workshop (pp. 87–90). Editor Robert Eklund. Gothenburg University. Sweden. 5–8 September 2003.

Doğan, O. (2001). Okuloncesi donem cocuklarının konuşmalarının akıcılık ozelliklerinin incelenmesi. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Ankara : Hacettepe University the Institute of Health Sciences.

Eklund, R., & Shriberg, E. (1998). Crosslinguistic disfl uency modeling: a comparative analysis of Swedish and American English human-human and human-machine dialogs. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP) (pp. 2631–2634), Sydney. Australia. 30 November –5 December 1998.

Eklund, R. (2004). Disfl uency in Swedish human-human and human-machine travel booking dialogues. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Sweden : Department of Computer and Information Science of University of Linkoping.

Engelhardt, P.E., Corley, M., Nigg, J.T., & Ferreira, F. (2010). The role of inhibition in the production of disfl uencies. Memory & Cognition, 38, 617–628. DOI: 10.3758/MC.38.5.617

Erişen, İ.O. (2010). Language production in a typological perspective: a corpus study of Turkish slips of the tongue. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Ankara: The Graduate School of Informatics of the Middle East Technical University.

Ferreira, F., & Bailey, K.G.D. (2004). Disfl uencies and human language comprehension. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 8(5), 231–237.

Fox Tree, J.E. (2001). Listeners’ uses of um and uh in speech comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 29(2), 320–326.

Fox Tree, J.E. (2002). Interpreting pauses and ums at turn exchanges. Discourse Processes, 34(1), 37–55.

Fromkin, V.A. (1971). The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Speech. In Victoria A. Fromkin (Ed.), Errors as Linguistic Evidence (1973) (pp. 215–242). The Hague & Paris : Mouton.

Goldman-Eisler, F. (1960). A comparative study of two hesitation phenomena. Language & Speech, 4(1), 18–26.

Goldman-Eisler, F. (1968). Psycholinguistics: experiments in spontaneous speech. London, New York: Academic Press.

Gosy, M. (2001). The double function of disfl uency phenomena in spontaneous speech. In Proceedings of Disfl uency in Spontaneous Speech (DiSS’01), ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop (ITRW) (ss. 57–60). Edinburgh, Scotland, UK. 29–3. August 2001.

Heeman, P., & Allen, J. (1994). Detecting and correcting speech repairs. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 295–302). Las Cruces, Mexico. 27 June – 1 July 1994.

Hieke, A.E. (1981). A content-processing view of hesitation phenomena. Language and Speech, 24(2), 147–160.

Hindle, D. (1983). Deterministic parsing of syntactic non-fl uencies. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 123–128). Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. 15–17 June 1983.

Johnson, W. (1961). Measurements of oral reading and speaking rate and disfl uency of adult male and female stutterers and nonstutterers. The Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 7, 1–20. PMID:13790352

Kjellmer, G. (2003). Hesitation, in defence of er and erm. English Studies, 84(2), 170–198. DOI: 10.1076/enst.

Kools, J., & Berryman, J. (1971). Differences in disfl uency behaviour between male and female nonstuttering children. Journal of Speech and Hearing, 14(1), 125–130. PMID:5550614

Laserna, C.M., Seih, Y., & Pennebaker, J.W. (2014). Um… who like says you know: fi ller word use as a function of age, gender, and personality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(3), 328–338.

Lee, T.L., He, Y.F., Huang, Y.J., Tseng, S.C., & Eklund, R. (2004). Prolongation in spontaneous Mandarin. In Proceedings of Interspeech (ICSLP) (pp. 2181–2184), Jeju Island. Korea. 4–8 October 2004.

Levelt, W.J.M. (1989). Speaking: from intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA : M.I.T. Press.

Levelt, W.J.M., & Cutler, A. (1983). Prosodic marking in speech repair. Journal of Semantics, 2(2), 205–218. doi: 10.1093/semant/2.2.205

Lickley, R. (1994). Detecting disfl uency in spontaneous speech. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Scotland : University of Edinburgh.

Liu, Y., Shriberg, E., & Stolcke, A. (2003). Automatic disfl uency identifi cation in conversational speech using multiple knowledge sources. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (pp. 957–960). Geneva.

Maclay, H., & Osgood, C.E. (1959). Hesitation phenomena in spontaneous English speech. Word, 15, 19–44.

Marshall, R.C., & Cullinan, W.L. (1971). Effects of reward schedule changes on children’s speech fl uency. Language & Speech, 14(4), 341–351. DOI: 10.1177/002383097101400403

Martin, J.G., & Strange, W. (1968). The perception of hesitation in spontaneous speech. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 3(6), 427–438.

Martin, R.R., & Rangaswamy, K. (1972). The effects of time-out from speaking on the disfl uency rates of normal speakers. Language and Speech, 15(4), 358–366. DOI:10.1177/002383097201500405

Martin, R.R., & Hasbrouck, J.M. (1977). The effects of punishment schedule on disfl uency rate. Language and Speech, 20(2), 127–135.

Menyhart, K. (2003). Age-dependent types and frequency of disfl uencies. In Proceedings of DiSS’03 (pp. 45–48). Editor Robert Eklund. Gothenburg University. Sweden. 5–8 September 2003.

Postma, A., Kolk, H., & Povel, D.J. (1990). On the relation among speech errors, disfl uencies and self-repairs. Language and Speech, 33(1), 19–29. DOI: 10.1177/002383099003300102

Shin, M., & Lee, K. (2017). Disfl uency, speech rate, and communication attitude differences according to gender and age in adults who do not stutter. Communication Sciences & Disorders, 22(4), 794–805. DOI:

Shriberg, E.E. (1994). Preliminaries to a theory of speech disfl uencies. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Berkeley: The Graduate Division of Psychology of the University of California.

Shriberg, E.E. (1999). Phonetic consequences of speech disfl uency. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences ICPhS (pp. 619–622).

Shriberg, E., Stolcke, A., & Baron, D. (2001). Can prosody aid the automatic processing of multi-party meetings? Evidence from predicting punctuation, disfl uencies, and overlapping speech. In Proceedings of ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop on Prosody in Speech Recognition and Understanding (pp. 139–146). Red Bank, NJ.

Shriberg, E. & Stolcke, A. (2002). Prosody modeling for automatic speech recognition and understanding. In Proceedings of ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop on Prosody in Speech Recognition and Understanding (pp. 13–16). Red Bank, NJ.

Siegel, G.M., & Martin, R.R. (1965). Verbal punishment of disfl uencies during spontaneous speech. Language & Speech, 10(4), 244–251.

Siegel, G.M., Lenske, J., & Broen, P. (1969). Suppression of normal speech disfl uencies through response cost. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2(4), 265–276.

Snover, M., Dorr, B., & Schwartz, R. (2004). A lexically-driven algorithm for disfl uency detection. In Proceedings of HLT-NAACL (pp. 157–160). May 2004.

Soderstrom, M., & Morgan, J.L. (2007). Twenty two month olds discriminate fl uent from disfl uent adult-directed speech. Developmental Science, 10(5), 641–653. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00605.x

Stolcke, A., Shriberg, E., Bates, R., Ostendorf, M., Hakkani, D., Plauche, M., Tur, G., & Lu, Y. (1998). Automatic detection of sentence boundaries and disfl uencies based on recognized words. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (1998) (pp. 2247–2250). In Robert H. Mannell & Jordi Robert Ribes (Eds.). Sydney: Australian Speech Science and Technology Association.

Tottie, G. (2011). Uh and um as sociolinguistic markers in British English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 16, 173–197.

d’Urso, V. & Zammuner, V. (1990). The perception of pause in question-answer pairs. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 28(1), 41–43.

Watson, J.B., & Anderson, R.T. (2001). Disfl uencies of 2 and 3 year-old Spanish speaking children from Puerto Rico. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders, 28, 140–150.
How to Cite
Altıparmak, A., & Kuruoğlu, G. (2018). Gender and Speech Dısfluency Productıon: a Psycholınguıstıc Analysıs on Turkısh Speakers. PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, 24(2), 114-143.