Lex actualization on describing of military acts, processes and states
The article describes the most commonly used lexemes from the texts of contemporary Ukrainian periodicals, reveals new lexicalunits, expands thes copeof the operation oflexemasonmilitarytopicsinthemediamaterialsofsocio-political, military an do the rissues; thefunctional-stylistic role of military vocabulary in the language of the pressis determine dandemphasizedon a negative evaluation injournalistic materials.
In the article for the study of military vocabulary in the language of Ukrainian periodicalsat the beginningof the XXI century observation and descriptivemethods are used. At different stagesof the study, the methodoffunctionalanalysis was used to determine the stylisticloadoflexicalunits.
Itisconcludedthatdueto a numberofextra-linguistic factors of socio-politicalorientation, the modern Ukrainian language was enriched with new tokens of militaryactions, processesandstates, whichis reflectedin the pages ofthen ational pressof the seconddecade of the XXI century. Inparticular: thelevelofdevelopment of science and technology in the language environment, socio-politicalcondition sin the linguistic society, thestate language (terminology) policyinsociety, the functional statusof the state language, the international status of the national language.
The military vocabulary is singled out into two groups: 1) the one that names persons; 2) the one that characterizes processes, actions and states. According to our observations, the most significant manifestations are lexemes of foreign origin for the nomination of persons. Quite often, military vocabulary has a negative coloring, contrasts with the neutral vocabulary and attracts the attention of the reader.
The military vocabulary is still a little explored layer of lexicology and requires a thorough study, in particular, the question of replenishment of thematic groups, word-building potential of lexemes, etc.
Baskova, Yu.S. (2006). Evfemizmy kak sredstvo manipulirovaniia v yazyke SMI: na material russkoho i anhlyiskoho yazykov [Euphemisms as a means of manipulation in the language of the media: on the basis of Russian and English language]. Candidate’s Thesis. Krasnodar [in Russian].
Bybyk, S.P. (2006). Slovnyk inshomovnykh sliv: tlumachennia, slovotvorennia ta slovovzhyvannia [The dictionary of foreign words: interpretation, derivation and usage]. Kharkiv: FOLIO [in Ukrainian].
Dubynets, Z.O. (2015). Viiskova leksyka v romani R. Ivanychuka «Malvy» [Military lexis in the novel of R. Ivanchuk «Mallows»]. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V.N. Karazina – Bulletin of Kharkiv V.N. Karazin National University, 73, 169–172 [in Ukrainian].
Kateneva, I.H. (2010). Mekhanizmy i yazykovye sredstva manipuliatsyy v tekstakh SMI [Mechanisms and language means of manipulation in the media texts]. Candidate’s Thesis. Novosibirsk [in Russian].
Kosenko, O.P. (2008). Strukturno-semantycheskie osobennosti tekstov medyinoho diskursa [Structural and semantic features of the texts of media discourse].
Kultura narodov Prychernomoria – Culture of the nation of the Black Sea Coast, 142, 386–389 [in Russian].
Lytovchenko, I.O. (2014). Uplyv ekstra- ta intralinhvalnykh chynnykiv na rozvytok viiskovoi leksyky ukrainskoi movy [Infl uence of extra and intralingual factors on the development of the military vocabulary of the Ukrainian language]. Filologichni stydii – Philological Studies, 10, 75–83 [in Ukrainian].
Slovnyk ukrayinskoyi movy [Dictionary of Ukrainian language] (1970–1980). (Vols. 11). Kyiv: Scientifi c thought [in Ukrainian].
Stavytska, L.O. (2005). Ukrainskyi zharhon: slovnyk [Ukrainian slang: dictionary]. Kyiv: Krytyka [in Ukrainian].
Turovska, L.V. (2007). Deshcho pro henezys suchasnoi ukrainskoi viiskovoi terminolohii [Something about the genesis of modern Ukrainian military terminology]. Naukovi praci – Scientifi c Works, 54, 79–84 [in Ukrainian].
Kholod, O.M. (2003) Imidzh: movlennia politykiv [Image: speaking of politicians]. (Vols. 2). Kyiv: Kyivskyi natsionalnyi universytet imeni Tarasa Shevchenka [in Ukrainian].
Shyller, G. (1980). Manipuliatory soznaniem [Consciousness manipulators]. (Trans). Moscow: Mysl [in Russian].
Cacioppo, J.T., & Gardner, W.L. (1999). Emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 191–214. doi: 10.1146 /annurev.psych.50.1.191
Diakidoy, I.N., Christodoulou, S.A., Floros, G., Iordanou, K., & Kargopoulos, P.V. (2015). Forming a belief: The contribution of comprehension to the evaluation
and persuasive impact of argumentative text. British Journal of Educational
Psychology, 85, 300–315. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12074
Imbir, K. (2016). From heart to mind and back again. A duality of emotion overview on emotion-cognition interactions. New Ideas in Psychology, 43, 39–49. doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2016.04.001
Clayman, S.E., & Loeb, L. (2018). Polar Questions, Response Preference, and the Tasks of Political Positioning in Journalism. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51, 127–144.
Abstract views: 55 PDF Downloads: 46
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.