Media Phraseology and the Dynamics of the Ukrainian Language: The Psycholinguistic and Stylistic Paradoxes


  • Dmytro Syzonov Kyiv National Taras Shevchenko University, Department of Stylistics and Speech Communication, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1162-2182
Keywords: idioms innovation, media linguistic analysis, media phraseology, psycholinguistic

Abstract

The present article involves the study of the dynamic processes of the Ukrainian language in printed and electronic mass media. Specifically, the description of functional paradoxes in the Ukrainian language is further presented in this article, with a particular focus on phraseological units (idioms) that function in mass communication. The sources of new phraseology that percolate into mass consciousness direct it through mass media and all described manipulative strategies show that the journalists like to use phraseological units and their stylistic transformations in media texts from the headline to the conclusion. The author gives scientific interpretation of the term medial phraseological unit (idiom) and its correlation with the term new phraseological unit / phraseological innovation in Ukrainian and European Linguistics. The author gives scientific interpretation of the term medial phraseological unit (idiom) and its correlation with the term new phraseological unit / phraseological innovation in Ukrainian and European Linguistics. The research and analyzes results collected as material for innovative dictionary of new words and phraseological units (2016-2018) showed, that Ukrainian language integrates itself into the world global process, enriches itself with new lexemes thanks to the English Language, has great psycholinguistic influence from the side of active political processes and connected with the innovations development. The results of the data analysis indicate that the ratio of the new idioms to the new vocabulary in the media in Ukrainian points to the pragmatic specificity of the phraseological resources of the Ukrainian language in the twenty-first century. Comparing the corpus media phraseology in 2016 and 2017, it can be concluded that aphoristic quotations of politicians occupy a substantial place among the new phraseologisms (30% and 32% respectively), advertising slogans, including political ones (25% and 23%), calqued phraseologisms (mainly from the English language) (12% and 9%), new clichés and stamps (8% and 9%), terminological neologisms (10% and 12%), and semantically transformed phraseologisms (15%).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bacevych, F. (2004). Osnovy komunikatyvnoi lingvistyky [Introduction to communicative linguistics]. Kyiv, Ukraine : Akademija [in Ukrainian].

Baranovskaya, I. (2015). Naujas žodis kalbotyroje: lietuvių kalbos frazeologija [A new word in linguistics: the phraseology of the Lithuanian language]. Vilnius, Lithuania : Naujoji šviesa [ in Lithuanian].

Botta, L., & Chemlab, E. (2016). Shared and distinct mechanisms in deriving linguistic enrichment. Journal of Memory and Language, 91. 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.04.004

Dobrosklonskaya, T (2008). Medialingvistika: sistemnyj podhod k izucheniju jazyka SMI [Medialinguistics: A systematic approach to learning the language of the media]. Moscow, Russia : Flinta; Nauka [in Russian].

Gajda, S. (2015). Aktualnye zadachi stilistiki [Аctual tasks of stylistics]. Aktualnye problemy stilistiki – Аctual problems of stylistics, 1, 5–17. Moscow, Russia : University of Moscow [in Russian].

Howarth, P. (1998). Phraseology and secondlanguage profi ciency. Applied Linguistics, 19, 24–44 [in English].

Knappe, G. (2005). Idioms and Fixed Expressions in English Language Study before 1800. Frankfurt am Main, Germany : Peter Lang [in English].

Mc Ginnis, M. (2002). On the Systematic Aspect of Idioms. Linguistic Inquiry, 33, Issue 4. 665–672. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2002.33.4.665 [in English].

Pashynska, L. (2011). Frazeologichni neologizmy v suchasnomu ukrainskomu masmedijnomu dyskursi [Phraseological neologisms in modern Ukrainian massmedia discourse]. Kyiv, Ukraine : KNLU [in Ukrainian].

Perrin, D. (2006). Medienlinguistik. Konstanz, Germany : Utb. [in German].

Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford, UK : Oxford University Press [in English].

Pinnavaia, L. (2000). English Idiomatic expressions: a historical pragmatic analysis. Di Martino G. & Lima M. (Eds.), English Diachronic Pragmatics (Proceedings of the Conference held at the Istituto Universitario Suor Orsola Benincasa, Naples, 13–15 May 1999). Naples, Italy : CUEN, 339–352 [in English].

Shevchenko, L. & Syzonov, D. (2017) Novi slova ta frazeologizmy v ukrainskyh masmedia [New words and phraseologisms / idioms in the Ukrainian mass media]: dictionary. Kyiv, Ukraine: Kyivskyj universytet [in Ukrainian].

Shevchenko, L. (2014) Medijna leksykografi ja v lingvistychnij perspektyvi [Medialexicography in the linguistic perspective]. Actual issues of Ukrainian linguistics: theory and practice, 28, 7–16. Kyiv, Ukraine : Kyivskyj universytet [in Ukrainian].

Shevchenko, L. (ed.) (2004). Literaturna mova u prostori naciona’noi kultury [Literary language in the space of national culture]. Kyiv, Ukraine : Kyivskyj universytet [in Ukrainian].

Shevchenko, L., Syzonov, D., & Dergach, D. (2014). Medialingvistyka: slovnyk terminiv i ponjat [Medialinguistics: glossary of terms and concepts]. Kyiv, Ukraine : Kyivskyj universytet [in Ukrainian].

Styshov, O. (2003). Ukrainska leksyka kincja ХХ stolittja (na materiali movy zasobiv masovoi informacii) [Ukrainian lexis of the end of the 20th century (in the media)]. Kyiv, Ukraine : KNLU [in Ukrainian].

Syzonov, D. (2017). Psycholinguistic bases of media literacy: considering the issue of media texts interpretation. Science and education, 7, 82–88. https://doi.org/10.24195/2414-4665-2017-7-13 [in Ukrainian].

Taranenko, O. (2015). Aktualizovani modeli v systemi slovotvorennja suchasnoi ukrainskoi movy (kinec XX–XXI st.) [Actualized models in the system of word formation of the modern Ukrainian language]. Kyiv, Ukraine : Vydavnychyj dim Dmytra Burago [in Ukrainian].

Van Dijk, T. (1997). What is Political Discourse Analysis? Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 11(1), 11–52. https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.11.03dij [in English].

Vezhbickaja, A. (2001). Ponimanie kultur cherez posredstvo kljuchevyh slov [Understanding cultures through key words]. Moscow, Russia : Jazyki slavjanskoj kultury [in Russian].

Wolf, E. (2002). Funktsionalnaia semantika otsenki [Functional Semantics of Evaluation]. Moscow, Russia : Editorial URSS [in Russian].

Zgołkowie, T. (1999). Poprawność językowa a skuteczność komunikacyjna [The popularity of communication and communications]. Wrocław, Poland : DDS [in Polish].

Abstract views: 110
PDF Downloads: 93
Published
2018-10-03
How to Cite
Syzonov, D. (2018). Media Phraseology and the Dynamics of the Ukrainian Language: The Psycholinguistic and Stylistic Paradoxes. PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, 24(2), 277-291. https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2018-24-2-277-291