Psychological Analysis of Levels of Communicative Actions Construction

Keywords: language, speech, communication, cognitive states, communicative functions, communicative actions, neuropsychological, psychoperceptual, psycholinguistic, social and psychological levels of communicative actions

Abstract

On the basis of numeral experimental studies, it is stated that the basic stages of any mental skills formation are physiological and neuropsychological levels. It is proved that physiological support is a complex functional system, which consists in the interaction of individual brain structures and it is an integral system of vital activities of the organism. The neuropsychological level involves the features of the brain organization of the process of communicative interaction. It is shown that the analysis of neuropsychological support of a communicative act enables to realize the essence and mechanisms of communicative processes at the level of brain structures functioning. It is noted that neuropsychological mechanisms, including psychoperceptual, psycholinguistic levels of constructing communicative actions, provide higher levels of the communicative process organization. It is found out that the psychoperceptual level of the communicative actions constructing is the initial stage of communicative interaction, which is represented by social perception as the ability to perceive, understand and shape the impression concerning other people. The theoretical analysis of conceptual approaches to communication research is realized. The direction of communicative actions construction is defined. It is shown that the strategic direction of the communicative functions formation is the need to consider not only the content-based characteristics but also the level ones that determine the sequence and stage-formation of the correction and development work on the formation of communicative skills. On the basis of the research, four basic levels of constructing communicative actions (neuropsychological, psychoperceptual, psycholinguistic and social and psychological) are determined. They allow to prepare psychological work on the development of communicative actions and skills successfully.

The neuropsychological level is established to involve understanding the features of the brain organization of the process of communicative interaction. The psychoperceptual level is represented by the processes of social perception in the system of communicative relationships. The psycholinguistic level is a means of transferring the cognitive and emotional states of the interlocutors through speech. The social and psychological level includes communication as an instrument of socialization. The basic and systemic levels of communicative actions constructing are outlined with the help of the scientific analysis and the strategy on the development of communicative functions is formed on this basis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bacevych, F. (2009). Osnovy komunikatyvnoi lingvistyky [The fundamentals of communicative linguistics]. Kyiv : Akademija [in Ukrainian].
Vygotskij, L.S. (1996). Myshlenie i rech. Psihologicheskie issledovanija [Thought and speech. Psychological research]. Moscow : Labirint [in Russian].
Goroh, G.V., & Karpaljuk, V.S. (2009). Komunikatyvna lingvistyka [Communicative linguistics]. Kamjanec-Podilskyj : Zvolejko [in Ukrainian].
Kosmeda, T.A. (2011). Pozytyvna tonalnist komunikacii jak chynnyk vzajemorozuminnja [Positive tone of communication as a factor of mutual understanding]. Lingvistychni doslidzhennja – Linguistic research, 32, 216–221 [in Ukrainian].
Kulchycka, A.V. (2012). Strukturno-funkcionalnyj pidhid do socialnoi percepcii v systemi pidgotovky fahivciv [Structural and functional approach to social perception in the system of specialists’ training]. Psyhologichni nauky – Psychological sciences, 1, URL: http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/e-journals/Vnadps/2012_1/12kavspf.pdf. [in Ukrainian].
Kuranova, S.I. (2013). Osnovy psyholingvistyky [The fundamentals of psycholinguistics]. Kyiv : Akademija [in Ukrainian].
Leontev, A.A. (2005). Osnovy psiholingvistiki [The fundamentals of psycholinguistics]. Moscow : Smysl [in Russian].
Lurija, A.R. (2006). Osnovy nejropsihologii [The fundamentals of neuropsychology]. Moscow : Akademija [in Russian].
Andreevа, G.M., & Doncova, A.I. (1981). Mezhlichnostnoe vosprijatie v gruppe [Interpersonal perception in the group]. Moscow : Izd-vo MGU [in Russian].
Omelchenko, I.M. (2008). Zmistova model komponentiv doslidzhennja socialnoi percepcii u ditej doshkilnogo viku z dytjachym cerebralnym paralichem [The content model of the components of the research on social perception in preschool children with cerebral palsy]. Visnik Luganskogo natsіonalnogo unіversitetu іmenі Tarasa SHevchenka. Pedagogіchnі nauki. – Bulletin of Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University. Pedagogical Sciences, 12, 201–206 [in Ukrainian].
Petrovskij, A.V., & Shpalinskij, V.V. (1978). Socialnaja psihologija kollektiva [Social psychology of the collective]. Moscow : Prosveshhenie [in Russian].
Petrovskij, A.V., & Jaroshevskij, M.G. (1990). Signalnye sistemy. Psihologija [Signal systems. Psychology]. Moscow : Politizdat [in Russian].
Pocelujko, A.O. (2015). Socialna percepcija: istoryko-fi losofski ta zagalnopsyhologichni peredumovy doslidzhennja [Social perception: historical and philosophical and general psychological preconditions of the research]. Sociologija – Sociology, 4, 54–61 [in Ukrainian].
Smirnov, V.M. (2004). Nejrofi ziologija i vysshaja nervnaja dejatelnost detej i podrostkov [Neurophysiology and higher nervous activities of children and teenagers]. Moscow : Akademija [in Russian].
Sokolov, A.V. (2002). Obshhaja teorija socialnoj kommunikacii [General Theory of Social Communication]. St. Petersburg : Izd-vo Mihajlova V.A. [in Russian].
Holod, O. (2013). Socialni komunikacii jak ponjattja v naukovij galuzi «Socialni komunikacii» [Social communications as a concept in the scientifi c fi eld «Social Communications»]. Psyholingvistyka – Psycholinguistics, 12, 286–293.
Hudjakova, V.I. (2003). Socialna percepcija jak chynnyk optymizacii upravlinskoi dijalnosti kerivnyka serednoi zagalnoosvitnoi shkoly [Social perception as a factor in the optimization of managerial activities of the head of a secondary school]. Candidate’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Alien, J.P.B. (1986). Functional-Analytic Course Design and the Variable Focus Curriculum1. In C.J. Brumfi t (Ed.), The Practice of Communicative Teaching (pp. 3–25). Oxford-New York-Beijing-Frankfurt-Sao Paulo-Sydney-Tokyo-Toronto Pergamon Press.
Bach, K., & Harnish, R.M. (1979). Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
Diane S. Berry, James W. Pennebaker, Jennifer S. Mueller, & Wendy S. Hiller (1997). Linguistic bases of social perception. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(5), 526–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297235008
Brodmann Korbinian (1909). Vergleichende Lokalisationslehre der Grosshirnrinde : in ihren Principien dargestellt auf Grund des Zellenbaues. Leipzig : Johann Ambrosius Barth Verlag.
Bruner, J. (1983). Child’s talk: Learning to use language. New York, London : W.W. Norton & Co.
Finger, S. (2001). Origins of Neuroscience: A History of Explorations Into Brain Function. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
Garnham, A. (1985). Psycholinguistics: Central Topics. London and New York : Methuen.
Lashley, K.S. (1929). Brain mechanisms and intelligence: A quantitative study of injuries to the brain. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
Kelley, H.H. (1973). The Processes of Causal Attribution1. American Psychologist, 28 (2), 107–128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0034225
Kim, M.Y., Joshanloo, M., & Foldesi, E. (2018). Relationship Between Emotional Expression Discrepancy and Life Satisfaction Across Culture and Personal Values. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9826-6
Mai, J.E. (2016). Personal Information as Communicative Acts. Ethics and Information Technology, 18(1), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-016-9390-4
Manera, V., von der Luhe, T., Schilbach, L., & et al. (2016). Communicative interactions in point-light displays: Choosing among multiple response alternatives. Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1580–1590. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0669-x
Osgood, Ch.E., & Sebeok, Th.A (Eds.). (1965). Psycholinguistics: a survey of theory and research problems. Bloomington, Indiana : Indiana University Press.
Treenwald, A.T., & Mahrain, R.B. (1995). Implicit Social Cognition: attitudes, selfesteem and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4–27.
Hebb, D.O. (1949). The Organization of Behavior: a Neuropsychological Theory. New York : Wiley.
Homans, G.C. (1958). The Human group. Social behavior as exchange. Social Behavior as Exchange, 63(6), 597–606, Emile Durkheim-Georg Simmel, New York : Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge : Massachusetts : MIT Press.
Skinner, B.F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York : Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Abstract views: 737
PDF Downloads: 648
Published
2018-10-03
How to Cite
Honcharuk, N., & Onufriieva, L. (2018). Psychological Analysis of Levels of Communicative Actions Construction. PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, 24(1), 97-117. https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2018-24-1-97-117