Psycholinguistic Concept and the Model of Speech Influence by A.A. Leontiev and Its Importance for Actualization of the Modern Communication Problems

Keywords: speech influence; value; sense; semantic field of the recipient; sign; field of values

Abstract

The article reveals the main provisions of the concept of speech influence and describes its theoretical model, which was developed by well-known psycholinguist of the 20th century A.A. Leontiev. The main ideas of this concept are explicated within the scope of the problem of speech communication and conditioned by this verbal act processes of speaking of the communicator (speaker) and listening of the recipient (s). The speech influence is considered by the researcher of this problem at the level of the internal and external stages of the communicative-speech processes generation of the speaker and the recipient. That is why A.A. Leontiev pays great attention in this concept to the analysis of such psycholinguistic phenomena as: «value», «sense», «semantic field of the recipient», «sign», «internal speech», «internal programming», «act of speaking» etc. The article reveals the following aspects: a) established by A.A. Leontiev evolution of the forms of communication and its psychological and semiotic mediation; b) separated by him stages of the historical formation of the activity of communication, in particular its final stage – the speech effect, which becomes a professional activity, motivated «from inside the self»; c) distinguished by the researcher notions of «speech» and «speech activity», d) defined by him the notion of «communication» and its varieties, e) associated with orientation – the criterion of speech communication – speech effect, which is characterized as one of the aspects of psychological content of communication, g) identified by three parameters phenomenon of the sign and applied in its interpretation two methods of scientific analysis important for a deep understanding of speech influence used, through the processes of understanding (the transition from a sign to the thought) and through the objectification of the subjective communicative intention (the transition from a thought to the sign) and other important provisions of the proposed concept. The content of this manuscript also describes the psycholinguistic model of speech effect, which, according to the author, has statuses or psychological actions, or appears as an independent activity with its own motive, has a feedback, acts in various forms of interference with consciousness and subconscious of the personality, etc.; the ways of achieving changes in the recipient’s existing values under the influence of the content of communicator’s speech are represented; the three-layer psycholinguistic structure of the speech influence is substantiated. In the debating section of the article, it is suggested to consider the scientific work of A.A. Leontiev concerning the speech influence as a psycholinguistic theory, by taking into account its theoretical and practical significance for modern science and communicative practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Vovk, O.D. (2014). Teoretichnі і metodichnі osnovi formuvannya komunіkativnokognіtivnoyi kompetentnostі maybutnіkh fіlologіv [Theoretical and methodological foundations of formation the communicative-cognitive competence of future philologists]. Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis. Cherkasi [in Ukrainian].
Dotsenko, E.L. (1997). Psikhologiya manipulyatsii: fenomeny, mekhanizmy i zashchita [Psychology of manipulation: phenomena, mechanisms and defense]. Moscow: CheRo, Izd-vo MGU [in Russian].
Kabachenko, T.S. (2000). Metody psikhologicheskogo vozdeystviya [Methods of psychological impact]. Moscow : Pedagogicheskoe obshchestvo Rossii [in Russian].
Kovalev, G.A. (1991). Psikhologicheskoe vozdeystvie: teoriya, metodologiya, praktika [Psychological impact: theory, methodology, practice]. Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis. Moscow [in Russian].
Latynov, V.V. (2012). Psikhologicheskoe vozdeystvie: printsipy, mekhanizmy, teorii [Psychological impact: principles, mechanisms, theories]. Psikhologicheskoe vozdeystvie: Mekhanizmy, strategii, vozmozhnosti protivodeystviya – Psychological Impact: Mechanisms, Strategies, Opportunities of counteraction. A.L. Zhuravleva, N.D. Pavlovoy (Eds.), (pp. 11–12). Moscow : Izd-vo «Institut psikhologii RAN» [in Russian].
Leontyev, A.A. (1972). K psikhologii rechovogo vozdeystviya [To the psychology of speech effects]. Proceedings: IV Vsesoyuznogo simpoziuma po psikholingvistike I teorii kommunikatsii – The Sixth All-Union Symposium on Psycholinguistics and Communication Theory. (pp. 28–41). Moscow [in Russian].
Leontyev, A.A. (1974). Psikholingvisticheskie problemy massovoy kommunikatsii [Psycholinguistic problems of mass communication]. Moscow : Nauka [in Russian].
Leontyev, A.A. (1999). Psikhologiya obshcheniya [Communication psychology]. Moscow : Smysl [in Russian].
Leontyev, A.A. (2003). Osnovy psikholingvistiki [Basics of Psycholinguistics]. Moscow : Smysl, SPb: Lan [in Russian].
Lakhtadir, O.V. (2017). Psikhologіchnі osoblivostі rozvitku komunіkativnoi kompetentnostі maybutnіkh fakhіvtsіv z fіzichnoї kulturi і sportu [Psychological peculiarities of the development of communicative competence of future specialists in physical culture and sports]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Nemesh, O.M. (2017). Psikhologіya komunіkativnoї dіyalnostі v іnternet prostorі [Psychology of communicative activity in the Internet space]. Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Tarasov, E.F. (2010). Problemy teorii rechevogo obshcheniya [Problems of the theory of speech communication]. Voprosy psikholingvistiki – Journal of Psycholinguistic, 12, 20–27 [in Russian].
Tarasov, E.F. (2017). Ontologicheskie predposylki teorii rechevogo obshcheniya [Ontological background of the theory of speech communication]. Voprosy psikholingvistiki – Journal of Psycholinguistic, 2(32), 160–168 [in Russian].
Chaldini, R. (2010). Psikhologiya vliyaniya [Psychology of infl uence]. SPb: Piter [in Russian].
Bosco, F.M., & Gabbatore, I. (2017). Theory of mind in recognizing and recovering communicative failures. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38(1), 57–88. doi : 10.1017/S014271641600004
Gross, E.F. (2004). Adolescent Internet use: What we expect, what teens report. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 25(6), 633–649. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2004.09.005
Katherine, Bessiere, Sara, Kiesler, Robert, Kraut, & Bonka, S. Boneva (2008). Effects of internet use and social resources on changes in depression. Information, Communication & Society, 11(1), 47–70. doi: 10.1080/13691180701858851
Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 49–74.
Rabab’ah, G. (2016). The effect of communication strategy training on the development of EFL learners’ strategic competence and oral communicative ability. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 45(3), 625–651. doi: 10.1007/s10936-015-9365-3
Raven, B.H. (1992). A power/interaction model of interpersonal infl uence: French and Raven thirty years later. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 7(2), 217–244.
Schwarzer, R., & Knoll, N. (2007). Functional roles of social support within the stress and coping process: A theoretical and empirical overview. International Journal of Psychology. 42(4). 243–252. doi: 10.1080/00207590701396641
Seidman, G., Shrout, Patrick E., & Bolger, N. (2006). Why is enacted social support associated with increased distress? Using simulation to test two possible sources of spurious-ness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 52–65. doi:10.1177/0146167205279582
Tavakoli, E., & Davoudi, M. (2017). Willingness to communicate orally: the case of iranian efl learners. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46(6), 1509–1527. doi:10.1007/s10936-017-9504-0
Valkenburg, Patti M., & Peter, J. (2009). Social consequences of the Internet for adolescents: A decade of research. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(1), 1–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01595.x
Wood, W. (2000). Attitude change: persuasion and social influence. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 539–570.

Abstract views: 161
PDF Downloads: 101
Published
2018-10-03
How to Cite
Maksymenko, K., & Kalmykov, H. (2018). Psycholinguistic Concept and the Model of Speech Influence by A.A. Leontiev and Its Importance for Actualization of the Modern Communication Problems. PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, 24(1), 227-251. https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2018-24-1-227-251