Functional peculiarities of emotional memory in the structure of diary discourse

  • Svitlana Ihnatieva HSEE «National mining University»
Keywords: diary discourse, autobiographic memory, emotional memory, emotions, feelings, process of recollection, random memorizing


Connection between the autobiographic memory with the emotional memory has been analyzed. Important features of diary discourse have been determined: focus on the information authenticity, subjectivity stipulated by the identity of the evaluation systems of both narrator and diarist as well as their structured spatiotemporal position. Imaginative “play” has been determined showing inconsistent, impulsive, and subconscious character of the recollection process formed by the flow of associations or generated by the method of thorough selection of the constituents reflected in a word. Emotions and feelings of a diarist with psychical processes are correlated. Their effect upon the diarist’s perception of the outward things has been determined as well as the ability to reflect the reality through his feelings that influences his memory. The diarist intimates his thoughts demonstrating his weak points – triggers; on the one hand, pressing the triggers irritates the diarist and even makes him suffer, on the other hand, the pressing favours the fact that the narrators keeps the triggers inside his mind feeling them for the whole life. The importance of objectness of feelings is emphasized being the reference to the situation provoking them. It has been determined that it is not the feelings themselves that makes up the memory content, but it is the emotionally coloured events that the diarist has experienced. It has been proved that the emotional memory forms autobiographic recollections representing them in the form of diary discourse as “flash of the experience”, “life in the past”. Random character of the emotional memory is considered to be its essential aspect in diary discourse as a person does not make any extra efforts or does not set any mnemic goal to remember certain life events.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Svitlana Ihnatieva, HSEE «National mining University»

Ph.D. in Philology, Professor, Institute of Humanitarian problems,
HSEE «National mining University»
prospect Dmytro Yavornytsky,19, the city is Dnipro, Ukraine, 46005


Vasylev, L. M. (1981). Semantyka russkoho hlahola [Semantics of the Russian verb]. Moskva : Vыsshaia shkola [in Russian].

Volia, O. (2011). Shchodennyk. Sorok rokiv. 1969-2009 [Diary. Forty years. 1969–2009]. Kyiv : Akonit [in Ukrainian].

Honchar, O. T. (2008). Shchodennyky [Diaries]. (Vols 3). Kyiv : Veselka [in Ukrainian].

Dovzhenko, Ondr. (2003). Vybrani tvory [Selected Works]. Kharkiv: Vesta: Vydavnytstvo «Ranok» [in Ukrainian].

Malyk, V. K. (2011). Synia knyha : shchodennyk (zapysky dlia sebe). 1958-1998 [Blue Book: Diary (notes for yourself). 1958-1998]. (2nd). Poltava: TOV “ASMI” [in Ukrainian].

Ohui, O. D. (1998). Polisemiia v synkhronii, diakhronii ta pankhronii [Polysemy in sync, diachrony and panchrony]. Chernivtsi: Zoloti lytavry [in Ukrainian].

Pohorelova, S. D., & Yakovleva, A. S. (2013). Sviaz otsenky s druhymy katehoryiamy yazыka [Relationship assessment with other categories of the language]. Sovremennaia fylolohyia – Modern Philology: Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference (pp. 86–89). Ufa: Leto [in Russian].

Soroka, P. (2002). Dusha pry svichtsi (Diiariiush Fedora Zhuchenka) [Soul at candlelight (Diayarius of Theodore Zhyuchenko)].Ternopil: Dzhura [in Ukrainian].

Soroka, P. (2003). Rik podviinykh raiduh. Shchodennyky 2002 roku [Year of double rainbow. Diaries of 2002]. Ternopil: Dzhura [in Ukrainian].

Soroka, P. (2006). Shchodennyky 2004-2005 rokiv [Diaries 2004–2005]. Ternopil: SOROKA [in Ukrainian].

Taniuk, L. S. (2004). Liniia zhyttia (z shchodennykiv) [Line of life (from diaries)]. (Vols 2). Kharkiv: Folio [in Ukrainian].

Abstract views: 64
PDF Downloads: 79
How to Cite
Ihnatieva, S. (2017). Functional peculiarities of emotional memory in the structure of diary discourse. PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, (22(2), 62-72.