«Нate speech» as a linguistic marker of a hybrid war
The following material is an attempt to prove linguistic and psychological influence of new media on the consciousness of the audience by changing the nature of the information and the language of its transmission, to explain the phenomenon of hybrid war from the point of view of functioning in the language system, study of the causes of occurrence and use hate speech in new mediain a comprehensive manner in the context of the Ukrainian-Russian war, to explain “hate speech” is a kind of “soft power” of “hybrid warfare”. In addition temporarily displaced persons have experienced considerable discrimination, in particular through the “hate speech” usage towards ethnical, race, social, cultural and religious groups, against the background of the events occurred in the East of Ukraine and on the occupied territory of the Crimea.
Against the background of the events occurred in the East of Ukraine and on the occupied territory of the Crimea hybrid war acquires consecutive signs and diffuseness.
“Hate speech” is precisely aimed at replacing the basic fragments of national world pictures of public members with the conceptual structures of the aggressor country.
The important discursive changes have occurred since the occupation of the Crimea and the beginning of the war in the Donbas region. The events of 2014 year have changed psycholinguistic, linguocultural paradigm of “hate speech”. This had an impact both on the media topics and on the content and usage of hostile expressions, provocations etc. “Hate speech” has become one of the technologies and a linguistic marker of so-called “hybrid war”, when the opponent’s image is deprived of human traits and is vested with absolutely non-human behavior; ways of personal identity according to social group are destroyed, that leads to self-identification change. The image of moral inferiority, criminality and negative impact on society is created; a certain linguistic and cultural, cognitive and pragmatic attitudes are formed, being aimed at denigration of opponent’s culture and ideals.
Wikipedia. Vilna entsyklopediia [Wikipedia. Free Encyclopedia]. Access mode: https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Мова_ворожнечі.
Vyhovska, N. Yazуk vrazhdуi: uroky manypuliatsyy ot zaporozhskykh SMY [Hate speech: lessons of manipulation from the media of Zaporozhye]. Access mode: http://detector.media/infospace/article/127118/2017-06-18-yazyk-vrazhdy-uroki-manipulyatsii-ot-zaporozhskikh-smi/.
Jan A.G.M. van Dijk. The Network Society. Social Aspects of New Media. Second edition\ London, 2006//. Access mode: http://www.forschungsnetzwerk.at/downloadpub/The_Network_Society-Jan_van_Dijk.pdf.
Dzialoshynskyi, Y. M. (2007). Obrazyi vrazhdyi v rossyiskykh SMY: sotsyalnyie, kulturne i professyonalnyie faktoryi // Rossyiskye SMY: kak sozdaetsia obraz vraha. Staty raznyikh let [Images of hostility in the Russian media: social, cultural and professional factors // Russian media: how to create the image of the enemy. Articles of different years]. Moskva: Moscow Bureau for Human Rights, 168 p. [in Russian].
Efremova, T. F. (2000). Novyi slovar russkoho yazyika. Tolkovo-obrazovatelnyi [New Dictionary of Russian]. Moskva: Rus. leng., 1209 p.; Encyclopaedic dictionary, 2009. Access mode: https://dic.academic.ru/contents.nsf/es/.
Movu vorozhnechi mistiat ponad 20% materialiv ZMI nepidkontrolnoho Donbasu – doslidzhennia [Hate speech contains more than 20% of non-controlling Donbass mass media – research]. Access mode: https://izbirkom.org.ua/news/zashchita-grazhdanskikh-prav-12/2017/movu-vorozhnechi-mistiat-ponad-20-materialiv-zmi-nepidkontrolnogo-donbasu-doslidzhennia/.
Klemperer, V. (1998). Yazyik Treteho reikha. Zapysnaia knyzhka fyoloha [Language of the Third Reich. Notebook of a philologist. Translation from German A.B. Hrygorieva]. Moskva: Progress-Traditsiya [in Russian].
Pashkov, M. ROSIISKA INFORMATSIINA EKSPANSIIA: UKRAINSKYI PLATSDARM [RUSSIAN INFORMATION EXPANSION: UKRAINIAN PLACTSARD]. Access mode: http://razumkov.org.ua/uploads/article/2017_Information_Warfare_ukr.pdf.
Moroz, O. Kakye konflyktyi voznykaiut vnutry sotsyalnyikh medya? [What conflicts arise within social media?]. Access mode: https://postnauka.ru/video/68876.
Pocheptsov, H. H. (2000). Ynformatsyonnyie voinyi [Information wars]. Moskva: Refl-beech; Kyiv: Wackler, 576 p. [in Russian]. http://savchuk.live/novaya-strategyya-kremlya-zamaskyrovannye-govnosajty-fejky-nabrosy/.
Slovnyk ukrainskoi movy: v 11 tt. (1970-1980) / AN URSR. Instytut movoznavstva; za red. I. K. Bilodida [Dictionary of the Ukrainian language: in 11 vols. / Academy of Sciences of the USSR. Institute of Linguistics; for ed. I. K. Whitehead]. Kyiv: Scientific Opinion. V. 2. [in Ukrainian].
Tolkovуi slovar russkoho yazуika (1935-1940) [Dictionary of the Russian language]. D.N. Ushakov (Eds.). (Vols 1–4). Moskva: Gos. in-t “Soviet encycl.”; OGIZ; Gos. publishing house inostr. and nat. words. [in Russian].
Shmelev, A. «Koloradyi», «vatnyky», «ukropyi». Yazyik vrazhdyi y rytoryka nenavysty [«Colorado beetles», «quilted jackets», «dill». Hate speech and rhetoric of hatred]. Access mode: http://www.pravmir.ru/koloradyi-vatniki-ukropyi-yazyik-vrazhdyi-i-ritorika-nenavisti/.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.