Psycholinguistic Study of Functioning of Cognitions and Metacognitions on the Levels of Social Intelligence
The article states that social intelligence in psychology is seen as the ability of a person to understand correctly his/her own behavior and the behavior of other people in the society. This ability is very necessary for a person to have an effective interpersonal interaction and successful social adaptation. Social intelligence implements the functioning of cognitive processes associated with the reflection of a person as a partner in the processes of communication and activities. The main function of social intelligence is to predict the behavior of others.
The authors of the article consider the concept of “intelligence” in the broad and narrow senses. In a broad meaning of “intelligence” it is only one intelligence, the intellectual sphere of the person in general. In this sense, the intelligence of a person can be described as a hierarchical system that has several levels. The first level is the level of functioning of cognitions. The second level of intelligence is the level of metacognitions. The third level of intelligence amplifies the characteristics of both the first and the second levels, while intellectual activity is carried out mainly at an unconscious level, a level that approximates a person to use of automated skills and abilities. The next, the fourth level, is the level of meta-intellectual activity, which explodes the creative achievements of the person.
It was proved that each type of intelligence contained some abilities of the person to perform a certain type of the activity. Guided by the narrow sense of understanding the word “intelligence”, it was determined: social intelligence; technical intelligence; artistic intelligence; information intelligence.
It was described the empirical research which was organized in different regions of Ukraine (the participants of this research were teachers and directors from preschool educational establishments). The results having been received in this research proved that the respondents of all groups have the results which show the advantage of average indicators of their ability to understand the meanings of non-verbal expressions and the meaning of the expression, depending on a social context. This may be due to the fact that these abilities are formed in the immediate process of communication and to a large extent depend on the conditions of the life of the subjects, at the first place – on the conditions of their professional activity, means and methods of professional activity of teachers of preschool educational establishments.
Ball, G.O., & Medintsev, V.O. (2011). Osobystist yak indyvidualnyi modus kultury i yak intehratyvna yakist osoby [The Person as an individual mode of culture and as integrative quality of a person]. Horyzonty osvity – Horizons of education 3, 7–14 [in Ukrainian].
Bazarov, T.Yu. (2013). Metodika ocenki lichnostno-delovyx professional'no vazhnyx kachestv lichnosti [A questionnaire for evaluation of personal and business professional-important qualities of the person]. Retrieved from mydisser.com/ru/catalog/view/252/807/ 18233.html [in Russian].
Bakhareva, N.V. (2005). Metodika mezhlichnostnogo prinyatiya (shkala prinyatiya individom gruppy) [A questionnaire for evaluation of interpersonal admissibility)] [in Russian].
Collins, M.X. (2014). Information Density and Dependency Length as Complementary Cognitive Models. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 43(5), 651–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-013-9273-3
Fedorova, E.A. (2009). Socialnyj intellekt kak faktor formirovaniya otnosheniya k socialno znachimym obektam u predstavitelej razlichnyx etnicheskix grupp [Social intelligence as a factor in the development of attitudes towards socially important objects among representatives of different ethnic groups]. Candidate’s thesis. Yaroslavl [in Russian].
Gardner, H.E. (1993). Multiple intelligences: the theory in practice. N-Y.: Basic Books.
Guilford, J., & O’Sulliven, M. (2007). Test “Socialnyj intellekt” [Test “Research of Social Intelligence”]. Retrieved from lib.chdu.edu.ua/pdf/posibnuku/160/41.pdf [in Russian].
Guilford, J.P. (1956). The structure of intellect. N.-Y.: “Psychol Bull”.
Kihlstrom, J.F., & Cantor, N. (2013). Social Intelligence. Retrieved from http://istsocrates.berkeley.edu/~kihlstrom/social_intelligence.htm
Minyarov, V.M. (2009). Metodika opredeleniya psixologicheskogo tipa lichnosti [A questionnaire for determining the psychological type of the person]. Retrieved from w.psinside.ru/ndos-850-1.html [in Russian].
Skock, R. (2008). Metodika ocenki kompleksnoj produktivnosti v upravlencheskix situaciyax [A questionnaire for evaluation of assessing the complex of productivity in managerial situations]. Retrieved from mydisser.com/ru/catalog/view/ 252/807/18233.html [in Russian].
Smulson, M.L. (2003). Psykholohiia rozvytku intelektu v rannii yunosti [Psychology of the development of the intelligence]. Doctor’s thesis. Kyiv: Nora-print [in Ukrainian].
Tillman, R., & Louwerse, M. (2018). Estimating Emotions Through Language Statistics and Embodied Cognition. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 47(1), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-017-9522-y
Torrens, P., & Guilford, J. (2012). Metodika issledovaniya divergentnogo myshleniya v modyfikatsii O.E. Tunik [Methods of studying divergent thinking in the modification of O.E. Tunik]. Retrieved from https://dytpsyholog.com/ [in Russian].
Zasekina, L.V. (2006). Strukturno-funktsionalna orhanizatsiia intelektu osobystosti [Structural-functional organization of intelligence of the person]. Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Zeigarnik, B.V. (2008). Metodika “Ponimanie perenosnogo znacheniya poslovic i metaphor” [A questionnaire “Understanding the portable value of proverbs and metaphors”]. Retrieved from ibib.ltd.ua/ponimanie-perenosnogo-smyisla-poslovits-25938 [in Russian].
Abstract views: 341 PDF Downloads: 199
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.