The Courtly Strategy of Speech Behavior of a Communicative Sadist
The article is devoted to the analysis of mechanisms of the courtly strategy of speech behavior as an expression of communicative sadism. The research was conducted in the context of psycholinguistics at the intersection of semantics, linguistic pragmatics and communicative linguistics. Considerable attention is paid to the essence, nature and characteristics of the phenomenon of communicative sadism, as well as the importance of studying this phenomenon as a variety of mental violence. A comparative analysis of foreign and domestic publications devoted to the study of aggression and violence in communication was carried out. The concepts of verbal aggression and communicative sadism were delimitated in detail and scientifically substantiated.
The phenomenon of communicative sadism is analyzed from the standpoint of destructive speech behavior, which is based on the three most common strategies of conflict behavior – invective, rational-heuristic, and courtly. A detailed study of the mechanisms of the courtly strategy of speech behavior by the semantic differential method has allowed opening the hidden semantics of the words of courtesy and etiquette formulas of the Ukrainian language. Cases of verbal abuse and humiliation of the interlocutor by the mechanisms of the courtly strategy of speech behavior are illustrated by examples of literary discourses and real-life dialogues. It is proved that etiquette formulas, words of courtesy, as well as lexemes with suffixes of diminution, caressing, which are affiliated with positive semantics in a linguistic system, are used within the framework of the courtly strategy of speech behavior with a provocative purpose to offend, humiliate or rebuke the opponent.
The conducted analysis allows expanding scientific knowledge about the range of receptions of a communicative sadist. In the conclusions the courtly mechanisms of the sadisti’s behavior in communication is clearly outlined. Among them is the tendency to indirect means of expressing disagreement (ignorance through silence), the disguise of the expression of negative emotions behind the etiquette speech formulas as well as the indirect confrontation by the means of emphasized politeness. Thus, in the work the main speech techniques of communicative sadistic mistreatment over the interlocutor are indicated, further research of which will allow to develop methods of counteracting violence in communication.
Baskakova, I.L. (2009). Praktikum po psiholingvistike [Workshop on psycholinguistics]. Moscow: Astrel [in Russian].
Bilokonenko, L.A. (2012). Peioratyvna y invektyvna leksyka v mizhosobystisnomu konflikti [Pejorative and invective vocabulary in interpersonal conflict]. Filolohichni studii – Philological Studies, 7, 119–127 [in Ukrainian].
Volkova, Ja.A. (2014). Destruktivnoe obshhenie v kognitivno-diskursivnom aspekte [Destructive communication in the cognitive-discursive aspect]. Doctor’s thesis. Volgograd [in Russian].
Volkova, Ja.A. (2012). Kommunikativnaja lichnost v cennostnyh parametrah nejekologichnogo obshhenija [Communicative personality in the values of non-environmental communication]. Izvestija Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – Proceedings of the Volgograd State Pedagogical University, 8(72), 4–7 [in Russian].
Kuiava, Zh. (2015). Derevo, shcho roste v meni [The tree growing in me]. Kharkiv: Knyzhkovyi klub “Klub Simeinoho Dozvillia” [in Ukrainian].
Mazirka, I.O. (2008). Psiholingvisticheskie osnovy verbalnoj harakteristiki lichnosti i jazykovoj kartiny mira geroev hudozhestvennoj literatury [Psycholinguistic foundations of the verbal personality characteristics and the linguistic picture of the world of the characters of fiction]. Doctor’s thesis. Moscow [in Russian].
Muraveva, N.V. (2004). Jazyk konflikta [The language of conflict]. Moscow: Termika [in Russian].
Sedov, K.F. (2004). Diskurs i lichnost: jevoljucija kommunikativnoj kompetencii [Discourse and personality: the evolution of communicative competence]. Moscow: Labirint [in Russian].
Sedov, K.F. (2003). O manipuljacii i aktualizacii v rechevom vozdejstvii [About manipulation and actualization in speech influence]. Problema rechevoj kommunikacii – The problem of verbal communication, 2, 20–27 [in Russian].
Stavytska, L. (2008). Ukrainska mova bez tabu: slovnyk netsenzurnoi leksyky ta yii vidpovidnykiv [Ukrainian language without taboo: dictionary of obscene vocabulary and its correspondences]. Kyiv: Krytyka [in Ukrainian].
Taranenko, K.V. (2018). Komunikatyvnyi sadyzm yak osoblyvyi typ verbalnoi ahresii [Communicative sadism as a special type of verbal aggression]. Molodyi vchenyi – Young scientist, 2(54), 213–215 [in Ukrainian].
Farr, S. (2017). Derzhsluzhbovets [Civil servant]. Kyiv: Tempora [in Ukrainian].
Sharifullin, B.N. (2004). Jazykovaja agressija i jazykovoe nasilie v svete jurislingvistiki: problemy invektivy [Language aggression and language violence in the light of legal science: the problems of invective]. Jurislingvistika – 5: juridicheskie i lingvisticheskie aspekty prava – Yurislingvistika – 5: The legal and linguistic aspects of the right (pp. 120–137) [in Russian].
Adams, G.S. (2016). Asymmetries between victims’ and transgressors’ perspectives following interpersonal transgressions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(12), 722–735. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12291
Lamarche, J.-B. (2012). The verbalization of repressed intentions. A Socially instituted practice. Language and Dialogue, 2(1), 174–189. https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.2.1.10lam
Lorenz K. (1967). On Aggression. N.Y.: Bantam Books.
Ponterotto, D. (2017). Motion for emotion: an empirical cross-linguistic study of conceptual construals. Language and Cognition, 9(3), 383–411. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2016.9
Tuinier, S., & Verhoeven, W.M.A. (2015). Neurobiology or agression and impulsivity. Acta Neuropsychiatrica, 11, 5–10. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0924270800036280
Abstract views: 307 PDF Downloads: 234
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.