Hemispheric Organization of Visual Word Recognition in Turkish Monolinguals


Recently obtained data from interdisciplinary research has expanded our knowledge on the relationship between language and the brain considerably. Numerous aspects of language have been the subject of research. Visual word recognition is a temporal process which starts with recognizing the physical features of words and matching them with potential candidates in the mental lexicon. Word frequency plays a significant role in this process. Other factors are the similarities in spelling and pronunciation, and whether words have meanings or are simply letter strings. The emotional load of the words is another factor that deserves a closer inspection as an overwhelming amount of evidence supports the privileged status of emotions both in verbal and nonverbal tasks. It is well-established that lexical processing is handled by the involvement of the brain hemispheres to varying degrees, and that the left hemisphere has greater involvement in verbal tasks as compared to the right hemisphere. Also, the emotional load of the verbal stimuli affects the specialized roles of the brain hemispheres in lexical processing.

Despite the abundance of research on processing of words that belong to languages from a variety of language families, the number of studies that investigated Turkish, a language of Uralic-Altaic origin, is scarce. This study aims to fill the gap in the literature by reporting evidence on how Turkish words with and without emotional load are processed and represented in the brain. We employed a visual hemifield paradigm and a lexical decision task. The participants were instructed to decide if the letter strings presented either from the right or the left of the computer screen were real words or non-words. Their response times and accuracy of their answers were recorded. We obtained shorter response times and higher accuracy rates for real words than non-words as reported in the majority of studies in the literature. We also found that the emotional load modulated the recognition of words, supporting the results in the literature. Finally, our results are in line with the view of left hemispheric superiority in lexical processing in monolingual speakers.


Download data is not yet available.


Andrews, S. (1997). The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4(4), 439–461. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214334
Babkoff, H., Faust, M., & Lavidor, M. (1997). Lexical decision, visual hemifield and angel of orientation. Neuropsychologia, 35(4), 487–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(96)00072-3
Balota, D.A., Yap, M.J., & Cortese, M.J. (2006). Visual word recognition: the journey from features to meaning (a travel update). In M.J. Traxler & M.A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics, (pp. 285–375). A.B.D. : Academic Press.
Barber, H.A., & Kutas, M. (2007). Interplay between computational models and cognitive electrophysiology in visual word recognition. Brain Research Reviews, 53(1), 98–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2006.07.002
Belet, Ş.D. (2009). İki Dilli Türk Öğrencilerin Ana Dili Türkçeyi Öğrenme Durumlarına İlişkin Öğrenci Veli ve Öğretmen Görüşleri (Fjell İlköğretim Okulu Örneği Norveç). Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 21, 71–85. http://dergisosyalbil.selcuk.edu.tr/susbed/article/view/308
Bogacz, R., Wagenmakers, E.J., Forstmann, B.U., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2010). The neural basis of the speed-accuracy tradeoff. Trends in Neuroscience, 33(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2009.09.002
Borkenau, P., & Mauer, N. (2006). Processing of pleasant, unpleasant and neutral words in a lateralised emotional stroop task. Cognition & Emotion, 20(6), 866–877. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930500348131
Briesemeister, B.B., Kuchinke, L., & Jacobs, A.M. (2011). Discrete emotion effects on lexical decision response times. PlosONE, 6(8), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023743
Brysbaert, M., Vitu, F., & Schroyens, W. (1996). The right visual field advantage and optimal viewing position effect: on the relations between foveal and parafoveal word recognition. Neuropsychology, 10(3), 385–395.
Brysbaert, M., & Dijkstra, V.H. (2006). Changing views on word recognition in bilinguals. URL : https://biblio.ugent.be/input/download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=685459&fileOId=685554 (29.01.2013).
Çeltek, A. (2014). Türkçenin Yabancı Dil Olarak Çevrimiçi Öğretiminde Bir İzlence Tasarımı. Turkish Studies, 9(3), 451–465. https://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.6411
Deason, R.G., & Marsolek, C.J. (2005). A critical boundary to the left hemisphere advantage in visual word processing. Brain and Language, 92(3), 251–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2004.06.105
Dehaene, S., Le Clec’H, G., Poline, J.B., Le Bihan, D., & Cohen, L. (2002). The visual word form area: prelexical representation of visual words in the fusiform gyrus. NeuroReport, 13(3), 321–325. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200203040-00015
Dolgunsöz, E., & Sarıçoban, A. (2016). CEFR and eye movement characteristics during EFL reading: The case of intermediate readers. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 12(2), 238–252.
Estes, Z., & Adelman, J.S. (2008). Automatic vigilance for negative words in lexical decision and naming: Comment on Larsen, Mercer ve Balota. Emotion, 8(4), 441–444. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.8.4.441
Fassbinder, W., & Tompkins, C.A. (2006). Hemispheric differences in word-meaning processing: alternative interpretations of current evidence. Aphasiology, 20(2–4), 110–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030500472397
Frost, J.A., Binder, J.R., Springer, J.A., Hammeke, T.A., Bellgowan, P.S.F., Rao, S.M., & Cox, W. (1999). Language processing is strongly left lateralized in both sexes: Evidence from fMRI. Brain, 122, 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/122.2.199
Garcia, D., Garas, A., & Schweitzer, F. (2012). Positive words carry less information than negative words. EPJ Data Science, 1(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds3
Göz, İ. (2003). Yazılı Türkçe’nin Kelime Sıklığı Sözlüğü. Ankara : Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.
Hauk, O., Davis, M.H., Ford, M., Pulvermüller, F., & Marslen-Wilson, W.D. (2006). The time course of visual word recognition as revealed by linear analysis of ERP data. NeuroImage, 30(4), 1383–1400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.048
Haznedar, B. (2007). Crosslinguistic influence in Turkish-English bilingual first language acquisition: The overuse of subjects in Turkish. In L. Belikova & Meroni ve M. Umeda (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition, (pp. 124–134). Somerville, MA : Cascadilla Press. http://www.lingref.com/cpp/galana/2/paper1553.pdf
Hellige, J.B. (2001). Hemispheric Asymmetry. What Is Right and What Is Left. U.S.A. : Harvard University Press.
Hofmann, M.J., Kuchinke, L., Tamm, S., Vo, M.L.H., & Jacobs, A.M. (2009). Affective processing within 1/10th of a second: high arousal is necessary for early facilitative processing of negative but not positive words. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Science, 9(4), 389–397. https://doi.org/10.3758/9.4.389
Hugdahl, K. (2005). Symmetry and asymmetry in the human brain. European Review, 13(2), 119–133. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798705000700
Jordan, T.R., Patching, G.R., & Milner, A.D. (2000). Lateralized word recognition: assessing the role of hemispheric specialization, modes of lexical access, and perceptual asymmetry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(3), 1192–1208. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.26.3.1192
Jordan, T.R., & Patching, G.R. (2003). Assessing effects of stimulus orientation on perception of lateralized words and nonwords. Neuropsychologia, 41(12), 1693–1702. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00326-3
Jung-Beeman, M. (2005). Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(11), 512–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.09.009
Kissler, J., Herbert, C., Winkler, I., & Junghofer, M. (2009). Emotion and attention in visual word processing – an ERP study. Biological Psychology, 80(1), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.03.004
Kissler, J., & Koessler, S. (2011). Emotionally positive stimuli facilitate lexical decisions – an ERP study. Biological Psychology, 86(3), 254–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.12.006
Kousta, S.T., Vinson, D.P., & Vigliocco, G. (2009). Emotion words, regardless of polarity have a processing advantage over neutral words. Cognition, 112(3), 473–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.06.007
Kuchinke, L., Jacobs, A.M., Grubich, G., Vo, M.L., Conrad, M., & Herrmann, M. (2005). Incidental effects of emotional valence in single word processing: an fMRI study. NeuroImage, 28(4), 1022–1032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.050
Lavidor, M., Hayes, A., Shillcock, R., & Ellis, A.W. (2004). Evaluating a split processing model of visual word recognition: effects of orthographic neighborhood size. Brain and Language, 88(3), 312–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00164-0
Larsen, R.J., Kimberley, A., Mercer, K.A., & Balota, D.A. (2006). Lexical characterstics of words used in emotional stroop experiments. Emotion, 6(1), 62–72. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.6.1.62
Larsen, R.J., Mercer, K.A., Balota, D.A., & Strube, M.J. (2008). Not all negative words slow down lexical decision and naming speed: Importance of word arousal. Emotion, 8(4), 445–452. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.8.4.445
LeDoux, J.E., & Phelps, E.A. (2004). Emotional networks in the brain. In M. Lewis, J. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of Emotions, (pp.157–172). New York : The Guilford Press.
Lieberman, P. (2002). On the nature and evolution of the neural bases of human language. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 45, 36–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.10171
Lupker, S.J. (2005). Visual word recognition: theories and findings. URL : http:// psycho logy .uwo. ca/faculty/lupkerpdfs/Lupker,%202005.pdf (13.10.2012).
McCandliss, B.D., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2003). The visual word form area: expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(7), 293–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00134-7
McClelland, J.L., & Rumelhart, D.E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: an account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88(5), 375–407. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375
Maviş, İ., & Özbabalık, D. (2006). Yaşlılıkta Nörolojik Temelli İletişim Sorunları ve Dil ve Konuşma Terapisi. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(1), 1–18 http://hdl.handle.net/11421/420
Mergen, F., & Kuruoğlu, G. (2016). Türkçe-İngilizce konuşan ikidilli bireylerin ikinci dillerindeki dilbilgisel ve anlamsal işlemlemelerinin karşılaştırılması. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 17(1), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.12336
Mergen, F., & Kuruoğlu, G. (2017). A Comparison of Turkish-English Bilinguals Processing of Emotion Words in Their Two Languages. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(4), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.460969
Mohr, B., Pulvermüller, F., & Zaidel, E. (1994). Lexical decision after left, right and bilateral presentation of function words, content words and nonwords: evidence for interhemispheric interaction. Neuropsychologia, 32(1), 105–124.
Mohr, C., Rowe, A.C., & Crawford, M.T. (2008). Hemispheric differences in the processing of attachment words. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 30(4), 471–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803390701550110
Nalçacı, E. (2010). Beyin işlevlerinin yanallaşması. In S. Karakaş (Ed.), Kognitif Nörobilimler, (pp.149–168). Ankara : Nobel Tıp Kitapevleri.
Nemrodov, D., Yuval, H., Javitt, D.C., & Lacidor, M. (2011). ERP evidence of interhemispheric independence in visual word recognition. Brain and Language, 118(3), 72–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2010.04.004
Oldfield, R.C. (1971). Oldfield Handedness Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
Özge, D., Marinis, T., & Zeyrek, D. (2015). Incremental processing in head-final child language: online comprehension of relative clauses in Turkish-speaking children and adults. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(9), 1230–1243. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2014.995108
Palazova, M., Mantwill, K., Sommer, W., & Schacht, A. (2011). Are emotion effects in single words non-lexical? Evidence from event-related potentials. Neuropsychologia, 49(9), 2766–2775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.06.005
Rozin, P., Berman, L., & Royzman, E. (2010). Biases in use of positive and negative words across twenty natural languages. Cognition, 24(3), 536–548.
Sadiyeva, G. (2004). Beyin hasarı geçiren Türk hastaların dil bozukluklarının dilbilim açısından incelenmesi. Azerbaycan Milli Bilimler Akademisi Dil Enstitüsü, 31, 219–242.
Sarıca, N. (2014). Idiosyncracy in native language acquisition snd linguistic transfer in second language acquisition. International Journal of Language Academy, 2(4), 554–563. https://doi.org/10.18033/ijla.127
Schacht, A., & Sommer, W. (2009a). Time course and task dependence of emotion effects in word processing. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 9(1), 28–43. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.9.1.28
Schacht, A., & Sommer, W. (2009b). Emotions in word and face processing: Early and late cortical responses. Brain and Language, 69(3), 538–550.
Scott, G.G., O’Donnell, P.J., Leuthold, H., & Sereno, S.C. (2009). Early emotion word processing: evidence from event-related potentials. Biological Psychology, 80(1), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.03.010
Seidenberg, M.S. (1995).Visual word recognition: an overview. Speech, Language, and Communication. In J.L. Miller & P.D. ve Eimas (Eds.), Handbook of Perception and Cognition, (pp. 137–179). San Diego, U.S.A : Academic Press.
Sommer, I.E.C., Aleman, A, Bouma, A., & Kahn, R.S. (2004). Do women really have more bilateral language representation than men? A meta-analysis of functional imaging studies. Brain, 127(8), 1845–1852. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awh207
Sutton, T.M., & Altarriba, J. (2008). Emotion words in the mental lexicon. The Mental Lexicon, 3(1), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.3.1.04sut
Taylor, S.E. (1991). Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 110(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.67
Toga, A.W., & Thompson, P.M. (2003). Mapping brain asymmetry. Nature Reviews, 4(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1009
Toğram, B, Çıkan, G., & Duru, H. (2013). İnmeli Bireylerin Üç Türkçe Afazi Testindeki Performansları Arasındaki İlişki: Bir Ölçüt Geçerliği Çalışması. Turkish Journal of Neurology, 19(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.4274/Tnd.07279
Tok, M., & Yıgın, M. (2013). Yabancı Uyruklu Öğrencilerin Türkçe Öğrenme Nedenlerine İlişkin Bir Durum Çalışması. Dil ve Edebiyat Eğitimi Dergisi, 8, 132–147.
Ulusoy, S., & Kuruoglu, G. (2013). Türk Afazili Hastaların Nesne ve Eylem Adlandırma Becerilerinin Dilbilim Açısından İncelenmesi. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 6(1), 1011–1031.
Yap, M.J., & Balota, D.A. (2009). Visual word recognition of multi-syllabic words. Journal of Memory and Language, 60(4), 502–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.02.001
Yates, M., Locker, L., & Simpson, G.B. (2004). The influence of phonological neighborhood on visual word perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(3), 452–457. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196594

Abstract views: 407
PDF Downloads: 234
How to Cite
Mergen, F., & Kuruoglu, G. (2019). Hemispheric Organization of Visual Word Recognition in Turkish Monolinguals. PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, 25(2), 214-233. https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2019-25-2-214-233