Modelling Associative-Semantic Content as Regards the Logic-of-Semantics Dimension of the Adolescents’ Speech

Keywords: speech and mental activity, speech consciousness, logical-semantic organization of the text, reasoning, associative link, free associative experiment, adolescence, speech development.

Abstract

Objective. The article deals with the analysis of the trends in the logic of the semantic organization of the speech and mental activity of adolescents as regards the dimension of the available semantic environment and that of the speech competences of an individual. It is stated that information about the world is systematized by human consciousness in the form of an associative-verbal field, whose producing and modelling is one of the ways of representing the speech competence of an individual shaping his/her destiny.

Materials & Methods. In view of the above, an empirical research of the distinctive features of expanding semantic content of the adolescents' speech consciousness as regards the dimension of the logic-of-semantics organization of the mental and speech activity was performed using the diagnostic potential of a free associative experiment. A system of relevant ways of construction and associative expansion of meanings in the semantic field of the speech consciousness of adolescents was chosen as the subject of the research.

Results. Drawing on the results of the frequency analysis of the use of typical associative patterns for organizing the semantic field of speech, it was stated that the most represented among adolescents is a semantic way of reasoning based on the identification signs of the general contour of the trigger word at the level of its meaning. It was proved that the greatest changes in the logic of expanding associative semantic content are observed among older adolescents, which is interpreted as the result of fundamental changes in the strategies for cognitive processing of information flows.

Conclusions. A conclusion was drawn about the stable tendency towards the standardization and unification of speech in adolescents during their transition to adulthood, and the reduction in the heuristic resource of the intellectual activity of older adolescent pupils was noted. In this context, the purposeful formation of speech and mental competences of an individual, the acquisition by adolescents of efficient methods of the logic-of-semantics organization of the associative semantic content of speech is defined as a necessary prerequisite for the personality development, as well as that for the speech and mental development of an individual.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahutina, T.V. (2016). Smyisl, smyislovoe pole i model situatsii teksta [Meaning, semantic field and model of the situation of the text]. Psiholingvistika –Psycholinguistics, 20(1), 15–26 [in Russian].
Babenko, L.G., Vasilev, I.E., & Kazarin, Yu.V. (2000). Lingvisticheskiy analiz hudojestvennogo teksta [Linguistic Analysis of Artistic Text]. Yekaterinburg [in Russian].
Zavershneva, E.Yu. (2015). Predstavleniya o smyislovom pole v teorii dinamicheskih smyislovyih sistem L.S. Vyigotskogo [Ideas about the Semantic Field in the Theory of Dynamic Semantic Systems L.S. Vygotsky]. Voprosyi psihologii – Psychology Issues, 4, 119–135 [in Russian].
Zinchenko, O.V. (2016). Rozvitok ponyattyevogo mislennya pidlitkiv u procesi Internet-spilkuvannya [Development of Conceptual Thinking of Adolescents in the Process of Internet Communication]. Candidate’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Karaulov, Yu.N. (2010). Assotsiativnaya grammatika russkogo yazyika [Associative Russian Grammar]. Moscow: LCI [in Russian].
Leontiev, D.A. (2007). Psihologija smysla: priroda, stroenie i dinamika smyslovoj realnosti [Psychology of Meaning: Nature, Structure and Dynamics of the Semantic Reality.]. Moscow: Smysl [in Russian].
Lotman, Yu.M. (2010). Semiosfera [Semii Sphere]. Sankt-Peterburg: Yskusstvo-SPb. [in Russian].
Romanova, T.V. (2017). Rechevaya samoidentifikatsiya po dannyim assotsiativnogo eksperimenta [Speech self-identification according to an associative experiment]. Politicheskaya Lingvistika – Political Linguistics, 6(66), 45–50. [in Russian].
Smulson, M.L. (2003). Psihologiya rozvitku intelektu [Psychology of the Development of the Intellect]. Kyiv: Nora-Druk [in Ukrainian].
Tokareva, N.M. (2015). Psihologіya komunіkativnogo modelyuvannya osobistіsnih konstruktіv u pіdlіtkovomu vіtsі [Psychology of Communicative Modeling of Personality Constructs in Adolescence]. Doctor’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Ushakova, T.N. (2011). Rozhdenie slova: problemy psihologii rechi i psiholingvistiki [Birth of the Word: Problems of Speech Psychology and Psycholinguistics]. Moscow: Institut psihologii RAN [in Russian].
Fomina, N.A. (2014). Sootnoshenie razlichnyih svoystv yazyikovoy lichnosti i osobennostey ee rechevoy deyatelnosti [The Ratio of the Various Properties of the Language Personality and Features of its Speech Activity]. In L.V. Zasekina (Eds.), Yazyik, rech, lichnost v zerkale psiholingvistiki – Language, Speech, Personality in the Mirror of Psycholinguistic (pp. 126–148). Lutsk: Veja-Druk [in Ukrainian].
Fomina, N.A., & Orlov, V.B. (2017). Rechevaya diagnostika osobennostey napravlennosti lichnosti podrostkov [Speech Diagnostics of Personality Traits of Adolescents]. Psiholingvistika – Psycholinguistics, 22(1), 208–225 [in Ukrainian]. doi:10.5281/zenodo.1088406
Chepeleva, N.V. (2005). Sociokulturnye faktory ponimaniya i interpretacii lichnogo opyta [Socio-Cultural Factors in the Understanding and Interpretation of Personal Experience]. In N.V. Chepelyeva (Eds.), Aktualni problemi psihologiyi: Psihologichna Germenevtika – Actual Problems of Psychology: Psychological Hermeneutics, 2(3), 6–13. Kyiv: Milenium.

Chomsky, N. (1968). Language and Mind. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.
Chrabaszcz, A., & Gor, K. (2017). Quantifying Contextual Effects in Second Language Processing of Phonolexically Ambiguous and Unambiguous Words. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38(4), 909–942. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716416000497
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.
Frank, St.L., & Christiansen, M.H. (2018). Hierarchical and Sequential Processing of Language. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 33(9), 1213–1218. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2018.1424347
Ishida, T. (2018). Semantic Ambiguity Effects in L2 Word Recognition. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 47(3), 523–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-017-9542-7
Spätgens, T., & Schoonen, R. (2017). The Semantic Network, Lexical Access, and Reading Comprehension in Monolingual and Bilingual Children: an Individual Differences Study. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38(1), 225–256. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716417000224
Published
2019-11-12
How to Cite
Tokareva, N. (2019). Modelling Associative-Semantic Content as Regards the Logic-of-Semantics Dimension of the Adolescents’ Speech. PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, 26(1). Retrieved from https://psycholing-journal.com/index.php/journal/article/view/719