Psychosemantic Analysis of Psychologists’ Representations About the Place of Psychological Counseling
Introduction. Psycholinguistic studies of a man as a linguistic personality open up new opportunities for scientists to develop technologies aimed to explore the role of counseling psychology in the system of psychological assistance in the representations of psychologists. The use of psycholinguistic research methods, in particular, psychosemantics helps to study the origin, structure and functions of the personal system of knowledge and definitions.
Aim. The aim of the article is to highlight the research results of word associations of psychologists regarding the role of counseling psychology in the system of psychology practice.
Research procedure: the study was conducted using the semantic differential scaling and the method of pairwise comparisons. Representatives of different branches of psychology who work in Ukraine took part in it.
Results. It was determined that counseling psychology is a totally independent branch of assistance in the representations of the research subjects.
Conclusions: the psycho-semantic research of psychologists’ word associations applyong the semantic differential scaling and the method of pairwise comparisons of all types of psychological therapy according to the criterion of similarity-difference has determined the role of counseling psychology in psychosemantic space. The more the phenomena, stimuli, objects studied are subjectively similar in the generalized psychosemantic space, the closer the indicators of these stimuli are located in the space of signs. Based on such a remote model, subjective data according to the differences of one stimulus from another their mutual arrangement are reconstructed in the space of several signs. The distance between these objects is an indicator of the differences. The research proves that psychological counseling is a totally independent branch of assistance in the representations of the psychologists.
Artemieva, E. (1999). Osnovy psihologii subіektivnoj semantiki [Fundamentals of the Psychology of Subjective Semantics]. Moscow: Science; Sense [in Russian].
Bondarenko, A.F. (1991). Socialnaja psihoterapija lichnosti (psihosemanticheskij podhod) [Social Personality Psychotherapy (Psychosemantic Approach)]. Kiev: KSPII [in Russian].
Bosnyuk, V.F., & Pereligina, L.A. (2017). Obraz psyhologa DSNS Ukrainy cherez pryzmu psyhosemantychnogo prostoru psyhologiv riznomanitnogo rodu dijalnosti [The Image of the Psychologist of the SES of Ukraine Through the Prism of the Psychosemantic Space of Psychologists of Various Kinds of Activity]. Problemi ekstremalnoї ta krizovoї psihologії – Problems of Extreme and Crisis Psychology 22, 67–74 [in Ukrainian].
Drobot, O. (2013). Psyhosemantychna teorija svidomosti u vitchyznjanij psyhologii' jak osnova psyhosemantychnogo doslidzhennja [Psychosemantic Theory of Consciousness in Domestic Psychology as the Basis of Psychosemantic research]. Aktualnі problemi psihologіji – Actual Problems of Psychology, X(25), 110–120 [in Ukrainian].
Kucherovskaya, N.A. (2004). Jeksperimentalnoe issledovanie professionalnyh predstavlenij psihologov o praktike psihologicheskoj pomoshhi (psihosemanticheskij podhod) [An Experimental Study of Professional Representations of Psychologists About the Practice of Psychological Assistance (Psychosemantic Approach)]. Zhurnal praktikujushhego psihologa – Journal of a Practicing Psychologist, 10, 106–126 [in Russian].
Makarova, E.Yu. (2009). Predstavlenija o psihologicheskom konsultirovanii u raznyh socialnyh grupp [Views on Psychological Counseling in Different Social Groups]. Candidate’s thesis. Moscow [in Russian].
Petrenko, V.F. (2005). Osnovy psihosemantiki [The Basics of Psychosemantics]. St. Petersburg: Peter [in Russian].
Serkin, V.P. (2008). Metody psihologii subіektivnoj semantiki i psihosemantiki [Methods of Psychology of Subjective Semantics and Psychosemantics]. Moscow: APIs [in Russian].
Shmelev, A. (1983). Koncepcija sistem znachenij v jeksperimentalnoj psihosemantike [The Concept of Value Systems in Experimental Psychosemantics]. Voprosy psihologii – Psychology Issues, 4, 16–28 [in Russian].
Imel, Zac E., Budge, S., & Owen, J. (2017). Introduction to Special Section on Advanced Methodology: Counseling the Dog to Wag its Methodological Tail. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 64(6), 601–603. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000253
Lorah, J.A., & Wong, Y.J. (2018). Contemporary Applications of Moderation Analysis in Counseling Psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 65(5), 629–640. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000290
Osgood, Ch.E., Suci, G.J., & Tannenbaum, P.H. (1967). The Measurement of Meaning. Illinois : University of Illinois Press.
Rakosi, C. (2017). Replication of Psycholinguistic Experiments and the Resolution of Inconsistencies. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46(5), 1249–1271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-017-9492-0
Stoklasa, J., Talasek, T., & Stoklasova, J. (2018). Semantic Differential for the Twenty-First Century: Scale Relevance and Uncertainty Entering the Semantic Space. Quality & Quantity, 35, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0762-1
Tracey, Terrence J.G. (2017). The Scientific Future of Counseling Psychology: Five Specific Areas of Predictions. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 64(4), 347–348. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000234
Abstract views: 553 PDF Downloads: 438
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.