Prosodic Characteristics of Semi-Spontaneous Speech
The present article analyses the idea of semi-spontaneous speech, comparing it to spontaneous and prepared types of speech; studies and describes the prosodic characteristics of semi-spontaneous speech, implemented in the genre of interview; studies the role of speaker’s level of preparedness to the communication act in respect of prosodic speech behaviour and differentiates proportion of the preparedness in spontaneous, prepared and semi-spontaneous speech; distinguishes a specific genre of mass media discourse – “star interview”, its structure and differential features, designating the role and functions of the interviewer in “speaker – interviewer – target mass audience” link. The studied material involves audio recordings of interviews with three popular British musicians: Phil Collins, Sting and George Michael. Separate monological statements taken from interviews were analyzed with a particular focus on prosodic characteristic, taking into consideration the matters under discussion, the speaker’s wish to elaborate upon a theme or shunt the conversation on another topic. Auditorial and acoustic analyses covered the research of such prosodic parameters as: the nature of the intonational scale, terminal tone and pausation peculiarities in the speakers’ speech. The central focus of the present research is on differentiation elements that characterize semi-spontaneous speech. The article describes essential aspects that have influence over the main prosodic characteristics of oral speech: experience in public speaking, individual characteristics of the speaker, physical and mental state, awareness of the topic discussed, desire to cover particular issues.
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2012). Praat (version 4.3. 31). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam. Online: http://www. fon. hum. uva. nl/praat.
Brandes, M. (2004). Stilistika teksta [Stylistics of the text]. Moscow: Progress-Tradition, INFRA-M [in Russian].
Duden. (2010). Das Fremdwörterbuch. Aktualisierte Auflage [The Dictionary of Foreign Words. Updated edition]. Mannheim, Zürich: Dudenverlag.
Duff, P. (2008). Language socialization. Sociolinguistics and language education, 8. New York: Springer.
Galyashina, E. (2003). Ponjatijnye osnovy sudebnoj lingvisticheskoj ekspertizy. Teorija I praktika lingvisticheskogo analiza tekstov SMI v sudebnyh ekspertizah i informacionnih sporah [Conceptual bases of forensic linguistic expertise. Theory and practice of linguistic analysis of media texts in forensic examinations and information disputes]. Materials of scientific-practical seminar, (Part 2, pp. 48–64). Moscow: Gallery [in Russian].
Gussenhoven, C. (2004). The Phonology of Tone and Intonation. Research Surveys in Linguistics. UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616983
Lukina, M. (2003). Tehnologija intervju [Technology of interview]. Moscow : Aspect Press [in Russian].
Morita, N. (2000). Discourse socialization through oral classroom activities in a TESL graduate program. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 279–310. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587953
Ochs, E., & Schieffelin, B.B. (2012). The theory of language socialization. Malden, MA : Wiley-Blackwell.
Shevchenko, I.S. (2015). Koncept kommunikativnogo povedenija i zhanr [The concept of the communications behavior and genre]. Zhanry rechi – Genres of speech, (pp. 23–26) [in Russian].
Soboleva, O. (2010). Osoblivostі vzhivannja grafіchnih tropіv u tekstah іntervju. [Specialization of the Counting Tropes in the Texts of Interviews]. Problemi semantiki, pragmatiki ta kognіtivnoї lіngvіstiki – Problems of semantics, pragmatics and cognitive linguistics, 18, 420–427 [in Ukrainian].
Syresina, I. (2013). Stilisticheskaja differenciacija anglijskoj dialogicheskoj rechi. [Stylistic differentiation of English dialogical speech]. Moscow: Prometheus [in Russian]
Abstract views: 137 PDF Downloads: 107
Copyright (c) 2018 Psycholinguistics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.