Psycholinguistic Features of Students’ Acquisition of Visual-Semantic Image of a Hieroglyph in Studying Japanese

Keywords: hieroglyph, hieroglyphic script, visual-semantic image of a hieroglyph, cognitive learning style of educational information.


Introduction. The article highlights psycholinguistic features of students’ acquisition of visual-semantic image of a hieroglyph in studying Japanese. The choice of the image category is justified by its ability to reflect in individual’s consciousness a complete picture of the object of cognition, which corresponds with the specific character of the hieroglyphic script. The visual-semantic image of a hieroglyphic sign has been defined as a complicated cognitive complex (mental image), which is an integral product of visual sensory-perceptual reception of all graphic elements of the hieroglyph formal structure, a coherent vision of it and conceptual representation, embodied in the meaning.

Goal. The purpose of the article is to present results of the study of psycholinguistic features of students’ acquisition of visual-semantic images of hieroglyphs. The following techniques have been chosen as the main psychodiagnostic tools: «Pictograms» by О. Luria, «Hidden Figures» by K Gottschaldt, «Matching Familiar Figures» by J. Kagan, «Free Sorting of Objects» by R. Gardner in modification by V. Kolg.

Results. Results of theoretical explorations on the psychological features of the problem of a personality’s acquisition of foreign languages, particularly, hieroglyphic, have been presented. It has been shown that interpretive capabilities of hieroglyphic signs are fundamentally different from the usual European method of linguistic codification of reality and that optimization ways of Oriental languages acquisition should be based on the differences between phonemic and hieroglyphic writing. Psycholinguistic peculiarities of students’ acquisition of the visual-semantic image of a hieroglyph have been revealed – character and structure of students’ visual and meaning images of hieroglyphic meanings have a significantly expressed individuality. The study of individual cognitive learning styles the educational information by students has shown that main cognitive skills and abilities are one of the factors of this success in combination with others; quality of the hieroglyphics acquisition improves with a good ability in systematization, generalization, unification of the unit into broad classes, as well as in the tendency to reasonableness.


Download data is not yet available.


Asadchih, O.V. (2007). Metodyka navchannia studentiv movnykh spetsialnostei usnoho yaponskoho monolohichnoho movlennia na pochatkovomu etapi [Methods of Teaching Oral Japanese Monological Statements the Elementary Level Students of Language Departments]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Bayramova, S.I. (2016). Formirovanie sluhoproiznositelnyih navyikov na osnove kognitivnogo obraza morfemyi (kitayskiy yazyik, neyazyikovoy vuz) [Formation of auditory-pronunciation skills based on a cognitive image of a morpheme (Chinese, non-linguistic university)]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Ulan-Ude: Buryatcky SU [in Russian].

Bondar, S.I. (2003). Psykholohichni osoblyvosti chytannia tekstu inozemnoiu movoiu studentamy z riznym kohnityvnym stylem [Psychological features of reading a text in a foreign language by students with various cognitive styles]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Vasilyuk, F. (1993). Struktura obraza [The structure of image]. Voprosyi psihologii – Problems of Psychology, 5, 5–19 [in Russian].

Kochergin, I.V. (2006). Ocherki lingvodidaktiki kitayskogo yazyika [Essays on Chinese linguistics]. Moscow: AST.Vostok-Zapad [in Russian].

Martyinenko, N.P. (2007). Spetsifika semioticheskogo izucheniya drevnekitayskih tekstov [Specificity of the semiotic study of ancient Chinese texts]. Extended abstract of doctor’s thesis. Moscow [in Russian].

Metodika «Piktogramma» (oposredovannoe zapominanie) (n. d.). [The technique of «Pictogram» (indirect memorization)]. Retrieved from:

Metodika «Svobodnaya sortirovka ob'ektov» (n. d.). [The technique of «Free sorting of objects»]. Retrieved from:

Metodika «Sravnenie pohozhih risunkov» (n. d.). [The technique of «Comparison of similar drawings»]. Retrieved from:

Metodika «Figuryi Gottshaldta» (n. d.). [The technique of «Gottschaldt figures»] Retrieved from:

Molotkova, Yu.V. (2014). Obuchenie ieroglificheskomu pismu studentov yazyikovogo vuza (kitayskiy yazyik) [Teaching hieroglyphic writing to students at a language university (Chinese)]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Minsk: BSU [in Russian].

Naumova, Yu.S. (2018). Struktura protsesu zasvoiennia studentamy vizualno-semantychnoho obrazu iierohlifu [The structure of process of students’ learning the visual-semantic representation of a hieroglyph]. Psiholingvistika – Psycholinguistics, 23(1), 258–273 [in Ukrainian].

Rezanenko, V.F. (1996). Formalno-zmistovi vzaiemozviazky elementiv suchasnoi iierohlifichnoi pysemnosti [Formal and substantive elements of the modern relationship of hieroglyphic writing]. Doctor’s thesis. Kyiv: KSU [in Russian].

Rubinshteyn, S.L. (1997). Chelovek i mir [Man and the World]. Moscow: Nauka [in Russian].

Strizhak, U.P. (2005). Sistema obucheniya ieroglificheskoy pismennosti: Yaponskiy yazyik [The System of Hieroglyphic Writing Training: the Japanese Language]. Candidate’s thesis. Moscow: MGU [in Russian].

Simonok, V.P. (2014). Realizaciya novyh podhodov k prepodavaniyu inostrannogo yazyka [Realizing of new approaches to foreign language teaching]. Proceedings from Shkola-seminar «Novi pidkhody do navchannia inozemnoi movy» – Seminar materials «New Approaches to Learning a Foreign Language» (pp. 87–89). Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].

Kholodnaya, M.A. (2004). Kognitivnyie stili. O prirode individualnogo uma [Cognitive styles. About the nature of the individual mind]. SPb: Piter [in Russian].

Shevchenko, N.F. (2018). Vyvchennya efektyvnosti navchannya inozemnij movi u zakladax vyshhoyi osvity: psykholohichna skladova [Study of the effectiveness of foreign language teaching at higher educational institutions: psychological component]. In I.O. Korniyenko (Eds.), Psyhologia: teoriia i praktyka – Psychology: Theory and Practice, 2, 135–142. Mukachevo: MSU [in Ukrainian].

Schedrovitskiy, G.P. (2005). Myishlenie. Ponimanie. Refleksiya [Thinking. Understanding. Reflection]. Moscow: Nasledie [in Russian].

Kay, Yan (2012). Otrajenie obraza mira vo vnutrenney forme ieroglificheskogo pisma [Reflection of the image of the world in the internal form of hieroglyphic writing]. In V.V. Krasnyih & A.I. Izotov (Eds.), Yаzyik, soznanie, kommunikatsiya – Language, Consciousness, Communication (Vol. 45, pp. 77–86). Moscow: MAKS Press [in Russian].

Jing, Liu. (2010). Language Learning Strategies and Its Training Model. International Education Studies, 3(3), 100–104.

Okita, Y. (2013). Kusho and Kanji learning by beginning Japanese language learners from non-Chinese character areas. Proceedings of the 11th Conference of the Japanese Society for Cognitive Psychology (p. 86).

Toyoda, E. (2001). Learning strategies employed for learning words written in Kanji Versus Kana. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 24(2), 1–16.

Yoshida, A. 吉田, 篤矢 & Sugaya, N. 菅谷 奈津恵. (2017). Kanji gakushū ni okeru kushō no kōka: hi kanji-ken Nihon gogakushūsha o taishō to shite 漢字学習における空書の効果 : 非漢字圏日本語学習者を対象として、[The Effect of Air Writing on Learning Kanji: A Study of Japanese Learners coming from a Non-Kanji Orthographic Background]. Dainigengo to shite no nihongo no shūtoku kenkyū «第二言語としての日本語の習得研究» – Acquisition of Japanese as a Second Language, 20, 98–115 [in Japanese].

Kobayashi, Y. 小 林, 由子. (2009). Kanji gakushū Kyōiku ni okeru meta ninchi kenkyū no yakuwari字 学 習 教 育 にお ける メ タ認 知 研 究 の 役 割. [Role of «Metacognition» Study for Kanji Learning and Teaching]. «日 本語 教育方法研 究 会誌» – Japanese Journal of Educational Methods Research, 9(2). 14–15. Retrieved from: [in Japanese].

Abstract views: 58
PDF Downloads: 58
How to Cite
Dolynska, L., Naumova, Y., & Shevchenko, N. (2020). Psycholinguistic Features of Students’ Acquisition of Visual-Semantic Image of a Hieroglyph in Studying Japanese. PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, 27(1), 30-51.