Semantic Representation of Social and Role Identification in Subject Self-Organization of Personality

Keywords: categorical conceptual modeling, mental self-organization, system-synergetic approach, subject, personality subjectness, social role identification.


Objective. Based on the psycholongvistic approach, which is widely represented in world personology and psychosemantics, revealing the subjective descriptive characteristics of a person, an attempt is made to build a model and diagnostic technique for mental personality self-organization (PSO).

Material and method. The psycholinguistic method of theoretical structuring and systematization of scientific and theoretical data is presented in the perspective of the subjective paradigm and methodology of the system-synergetic approach (psychological and philosophical) is presented in the construction of a categorical-conceptual model of subjectivity in PSO. Based on the method of categorical-conceptual modeling, a model and methodology for semantic analysis and assessment of subjectness self-organization of personality based on individual characteristics of the experience of social-role identification, reflecting the characteristics of feelings and constructs of understanding that determine the conscious will of the subject, is developed.

Results. Psycholinguistic scales of semantic constructs are highlighted of the psychic (functional and motivational) and activity (professional, business, and creative) levels of subjectivity are distinguished. The empirical material reflects the verification of the semantic model and methodology. Modified repertoire lattices by J. Kelly and expert assessment in semantic analysis and classification of constructs served as a method of collecting empirical data. An array of constructs obtained (N=2000) reflects the well-known categorical-conceptual aspects of psychic phenomena (processes-states-properties) and external environmental and sociocultural characteristics, thus revealing the socio-psychological aspects of social-role personality identification, which allows analysis and subjectness assessment. Findings. The presented semantic scales of qualities and personality traits (factors of socio-psychological identification) reveal the systemic relationship and the level structure of the PSO, and also make it possible to assess subjectness.


Download data is not yet available.


Ananev, B.G. (1968). Chelovek kak predmet poznaniya [Human as a Subject of Knowledge]. Leningrad: LGU [in Russian].

Anohin, P.K. (1975). Ocherki po fiziologii funkcionalnyh system [Essays on the physiology of functional systems]. Akademiya medicinskih nauk SSSR. Moscow: Medicina [in Russian].

Artemeva, E.Yu. (1999). Osnovy psihologii sub’ektivnoj semantiki [Fundamentals of the Psychology of Subjective Semantics]. Moscow: Nauka; Smysl [in Russian].

Bogdanov, V.A. (1987). Sistemologicheskoe modelirovanie lichnosti v socialnoj psihologii [Systemological Modeling of Personality in Social Psychology]. Leningrad: Izd-vo LGU [in Russian].

Brushlinskij, A.V. (2002). Psihologiya sub’ekta: individa i gruppy [Psychology of the subject: the individual and the group]. Psihologicheskij zhurnal – Psychology Journal, 23(1), 72–80 [in Russian].

Vundt, V. (2002). Vvedenie v psihologiyu [Introduction to Psychology]. St. Petersburg: Piter [in Russian].

Gamezo, M.V., & Domashenko, I.A. (Eds.). (2004). Atlas po psihologii [Atlas of Psychology]. Moscow: Pedagogicheskoe obshchestvo Rossii [in Russian].

Dyakov, S.I. (2014). Model semanticheskogo analiza i ocenki sub’ektnosti lichnosti [Model of semantic analysis and assessment of personality subjectivity]. Psihologicheskaya diagnostika – Psychological Diagnosis, 1, 36–56 [in Russian].

Dyakov, S.I. (2015). Subektnost pedagoga. Semanticheskie modeli i tekhnologiya issledovaniya [Subjectivity of the Teacher. Semantic Models and Research Technology] (2nd ed.). Moscow: FLINTA: Nauka [in Russian].

Dyakov S.I. (2016a). Mekhanizm «sdviga motiva na cel» v semanticheskoj sisteme psihicheskoj samoorganizacii sub’ekta [The Mechanism of “Motive-to-Target Shift” in the Semantic System of the Subject’s Mental Self-Organization]. Teoreticheskaya i eksperimentalnaya psihologiya – Theoretical and Experimental Psychology, 9(4), 87–100 [in Russian].

Dyakov, S.I. (2016b). Semantika samoorganizacii cheloveka kak sub’ekta zhizni. Osnovy psihologii sub’ekta [Semantics of Human Self-Organization as a Subject of Life. Basics of the Psychology of the Subject]. St. Peterburg: Prospekt Nauki [in Russian].

Dyakov, S.I. (2017). Psihosemanticheskij podhod v metodologii issledovaniya samoorganizacii cheloveka kak sub’ekta zhizni [Psychosemantic Approach to the Methodology of the Study of Human Self-Organization as A Subject of Life]. Mir psihologii – World of Psychology, 4, 148–157 [in Russian].

Dyakov, S.I. (2018). Psihicheskaya samoorganizaciya cheloveka kak sub’ekta zhizni. Semanticheskij princip [Mental Self-Organization of a Person as a Subject of Life. Semantic Principle]. Izvestiya Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya Psihologiya – News of Irkutsk State University. Psychology Series, 23, 15–27 [in Russian].

Zajceva, Yu.E. (2016). Ya-narrativ kak instrument konstruirovaniya identichnosti: ekzistencialno-narrativnyj podhod [I-narrative as a Tool for Constructing Identity: An Existential-Narrative Approach]. Vestnik SPbGU – Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University, 16(1), 118–136 [in Russian].

Karvasarskij, B.D. (2002). Psihoterapiya [Psychotherapy] (2nd ed.). St. Peterburg: Piter [in Russian].

Levin, K. (2001). Dinamicheskaya psihologiya [Dynamic Psychology]. (Transl. E. Patyaeva & D. Leontev). Moscow: Smysl [in Russian].

Leontev, D.A. (2003). Psihologiya smysla: priroda, stroenie i dinamika smyslovoj realnosti [Psychology of meaning: Nature, Structure and Dynamics of Semantic Reality]. Moscow: Smysl [in Russian].

Lefevr, V. (1991). Formula cheloveka: Kontury fundamentalnoj psihologii [Human Formula: The Contours of Fundamental Psychology]. Moscow: Progress [in Russian].

Lomov, B.F. (1984). Metodologicheskie i teoreticheskie problemy psihologii [Methodological and Theoretical Problems of Psychology]. Moscow: Nauka [in Russian].

Lomov, B.F. (1996). Sistemnost v psihologii [Consistency in Psychology]. Moscow: Izd-vo «Institut prakticheskoj psihologii», Voronezh: NPO «MODEK» [in Russian].

Menegeti, A. (2015). Vvedenie v ontopsihologiyu [Introduction to Ontopsychology]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo: BF «Ontopsihologiya» [in Russian].

Merlin, V.S. (2005). Psihologiya individualnosti: Izbrannye psihologicheskie Trudy [Psychology of personality: Selected Psychological Works]. In E.A. Klimov (Ed.). Moscow: Izdatelstvo Moskovskogo psihologo-socialnogo instituta [in Russian].

Meshcheryakov, B.G., & Zinchenko, V.P. (Eds.). (2003). Bolshoj psihologicheskij slovar [Great Psychological Dictionary]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo: Prajm-Evroznak [in Russian].

Mej, R. (1997). Lyubov i volya [Love and Will]. Moscow: Refl-buk; Kyiv: Vakler [in Russian].

Nikandrov, V.V. (2003). Metod modelirovaniya v psihologii [Modeling Method in Psychology]. St. Peterburg: Rech [in Russian].

Petrenko, V. (2005). Osnovy psihosemantiki [The Basics of Psychosemantics]. St. Petersburg: Piter [in Russian].

Prigozhin, I., & Stengers, I. (1986). Poryadok iz haosa: Novyj dialog cheloveka s prirodoj [Order out of Chaos: A New Dialogue Between Human and Nature]. (Trans. from English). In V.I. Arshinov, Ju.L. Klimontovich & Ju.V. Sachkov (Eds.). Moscow: Progress [in Russian].

Sartr, Zh. (2000). Bytie i nichto. Opyt fenomenologicheskoj ontologii [Being and nothing. The Experience of Phenomenological Ontology]. Moscow: Respublika [in Russian].

Sergienko, E.A. (2013). Problema sootnosheniya ponyatij sub’ekta i lichnosti [The problem of the relationship between the concepts of subject and personality]. Psihologicheskij zhurnal – Psychology Journal, 34(2), 5–16 [in Russian].

Serkin, V.P. (2017). Psihosemantika [Psychosemantics]. Moscow: Yurajt [in Russian].

Fransella, F., & Bannister, D. (1987). Novyj metod issledovaniya lichnosti [A new method of researching personality]. Moscow: Progress [in Russian].

Fromm, E. (2006). Begstvo ot svobody. Chelovek dlya sebya [Escape from freedom. Human for Himself]. Moscow: ACT [in Russian].

Chepeleva, N., & Rudnickaya, S. (2019). Dyskursyvni Tekhnolohii Osobystosti Shcho Samoproektuietsia [Discursive technologies of Self-Developing Personality]. Psiholingvistika – Psycholinguistics, 25(1), 363–383. [in Ukrainian].

Shvarc, S.H. (2008). Kulturnye cennostnye orientacii: priroda i sledstviya nacionalnyh razlichij [Cultural value orientations: Nature and consequences of national differences]. Psihologiya – Psychology, 2, 36–67 [in Russian].

Aizenk, H.J. (1997). Personality and experimental psychology: The unification of psychology and the possibility of a paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1224–1237.

Allport, G.W., & Odbert, H.S. (1936). Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47, (No. 211).

Almagor, M., Tellegen, A., & Waller, N. (1995). The Big Seven Model: A cross-cultural replication and further exploration of the basic dimensions of natural language of trait descriptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 300–307.

Ashton, M., Kibeom, L., Perugini, M., Szarota, P., de Vries, R.E., ... de Raad, B. (2004). A Six-Factor Structure of Personality-Descriptive Adjectives: Solutions From Psycholexical Studies in Seven Languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 356–366.

Borgatta, E.F. (1964). The structure of personality characteristics. Behavioral Science, 9, 8–17.

Chomsky, N. (2000). New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Grof, S. (2000). Psychology of the future. New York: State University of New York Pressm.

Habermas, T., & de Silveira, C. (2008). The development of global coherence in life narratives across adolescence: Temporal, causal, and thematic aspects. Developmental Psychology, 44, 707–721.

Haken, G. (1995). Erfolgsgeheimnisse der Natur: Synergetik, die Lehre vom Zusammenwirke. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.

Hall, C. (1970). Lindsey G. Theories of Personality. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Hammack, P.L. (2008). Narrative and the cultural psychology of identity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 222–247.

Harley, T. (2009). Talking the talk: Language, psychology and science. Hove: Psychology Press.

Kelly, G.A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs (Vols. 1–2). New York: Norton.

Kettell, R.B. (1943). The description of personality: Basic traits resolved intoclusters. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38, 476–506.

Maslow, A.H. (1991). Critique of self-actualization theory. The Journal of Humanistic Education and Development, 29(3), 103–108.

McCrae, R.R., Costa, P.Jr., Martin, T.A., Oryol, V.E., Rukavishnikov A.A., … Urbánek, T. (2004). Consensual validation of personality traits across cultures. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 179–201.

McKinley, J.C, & Hathaway, S.R. (1944). A multiphasic personality schedule (Minnesota): V. Hysteria, Hypomania, and Psychopathic Deviate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 28, 153–174.

McLean, K., Pasupathi, M., & Pals, J. (2007). Selves creating stories creating selves: a process model of self-development. Personality and social psychology review, 11(3), 262–278.

Menn, L. (2016). Psycholinguistics: Introduction and Applications (2nd ed.). San Diego: Plural Publishing, Inc.

Osgood, Ch. (1956). Method and Theory in Experimental Psychology. Oxford.

Schwartz, S.H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C., ... Dirilen-Gumus, O. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 663–688.

Steinberg, D.D., & Sciarini, N.V. (2013). An Introduction to Psycholinguistics (2nd ed.). Routledge. London.

Titchener, E.B. (1901–1906). Experimental Psychology: A Manuel of laboratory Practice. New-York, London: Macmillan and Co.

Abstract views: 83
PDF Downloads: 32
How to Cite
Dyakov , S. (2020). Semantic Representation of Social and Role Identification in Subject Self-Organization of Personality. PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, 27(1), 52-79.