Psycholinguistic Peculiarities of the Development of Communicative Competence of Teachers of Secondary Schools
The purpose of the article is to analyze psycholinguistic peculiarities of the development of communicative competence in the structure of social intelligence of teachers and directors of secondary schools in contemporary Ukrainian society.
Methods of the Research. The following theoretical methods of the research were used to solve the tasks formulated in the article: a categorical method, structural and functional methods, the methods of the analysis, systematization, modeling, generalization. Also we used empirical methods – the methods of observation, conversation, testing with the aim to study the structure of communicative competence and social intelligence of teachers; psychological and pedagogical experiment in a form of the research of the development of the structure of communicative competence and social intelligence of teachers.
The results of the Research. In the content of communicative competence of teachers we can emphasize the ability to optimize interpersonal relationships in the group; social sensitivity; a set of communicative skills, behavior patterns and communication techniques; a communicative potential; the interpretative competence. Teachers with a low level of communication competence have characterized by communicative failures caused by a violation of their orientation onto the process of communication: non-motivated change of speech strategies, mental orientations and the register of speech; failure by the speaker communicate postulates; neglecting by the speaker the linguistic means, which involve the maxim of the tact; unsuccessful choice by the speaker the tone and the register of communication. Scripts of role deixis, explicit and implicit pragmatic constituents in the structure of teacher’s communicative competence were formulated, their content was revealed.
Conclusions. Psycholinguistic peculiarities of the development of communicative competence of the teachers and the directors of schools were established: the composite assessment of the teacher’s communicative competence positively correlates with social intelligence, reflexive and empathic personal abilities; communicative competence of the teacher depends on the actualization of scripts of role deixis, explicit and implicit pragmatic constituents in its structure, etc.
Baklushinskiy, S.A., & Belinskaya, E.P. (1998). Razvitie predstavlenij o ponyatii “socialnaya identichnost” [The development of ideas about the concept of “social identity”]. In V.S. Sobkin (Ed.), Jetnos. Identichnost. Obrazovanie – Ethnos. Identity. Education (Vol. IV(VI), (pp. 64–85). Moscow: CSO RAO [in Russian].
Ball, G.O., & Medintsev, V.O. (2011). Osobystist yak indyvidualnyi modus kultury i yak intehratyvna yakist osoby [The Person as an individual mode of culture and as integrative quality of a person]. Horyzonty osvity – Horizons of Education, 3, 7–14 [in Ukrainian].
Bern, E. (2002). Ljudi, kotorye igrajut v igry. Igry, v kotorye igrajut ljudi [People who play games. Games are Played by People]. Moscow: FAIR-PRESS [in Russian].
Buller, К.К. (2000). Teorija jazyka. Reprezentativnaja funkcija jazyka [Theory of the language. Representative function of the language]. Мoscow: Progress [in Russian].
Bandura, A. (2000). Teoriya socialnogo naucheniya [The theory of Social learning]. St. Petersburg: Eurasia [in Russian].
Boiko, V.V. (2017). Metodika diagnostiki kommunikativnoj tolerantnosti [Methods to Diagnostic Communicative Tolerance]. URL: psylist.net/praktikum/boiko.htm [in Russian].
Collins, M.X. (2014). Information Density and Dependency Length as Complementary Cognitive Models. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 43(5), 651–681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-013-9273-3
Donnikova, I. A. (2018). Nravstvennyj poisk v multikulturnoj kommunikacii [Moral Search in Multicultural Communication]. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, 14, 30–41 https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i14.150545 [in Russian]
Fedorova, E.A. (2009). Socialnyj intellekt kak faktor formirovaniya otnosheniya k socialno znachimym ob’ektam u predstavitelej razlichnyx etnicheskix grupp [Social Intelligence as a Factor in the Development of Attitudes Towards Socially Important Objects Among Representatives of Different Ethnic Groups]. Candidate’s thesis. Yaroslavl [in Russian].
Gardner, G. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. London: Heinemann.
Gardner, G.E. (1993). Multiple intelligences: the theory in practice. New-York: Basic Books.
Gergen, K. (1995). Dvizhenie socialnogo konstrukcionizma v sovremennoj psixologii [The movement of social constructionism in contemporary psychology]. Moscow: Science [in Russian].
Guilford, J.P. (1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53(4), 267–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040755
Guilford, J., & O’Sulliven, M. (2007). Test “Socialnyj intellekt’ [Test “Research of Social Intelligence”]. URL: lib.chdu.edu.ua/pdf/posibnuku/160/41.pdf [in Russian].
Ivashkevych, E.Z. (2018). Psykholohiia sotsialnoho intelektu pedahoha [The psychology of social intelligence of a teacher]. Doctor’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Kalmykova, L.А., & Kalmykov G.V. (2015). Konceptualnye podhody k sovershenstvovaniju psihologicheskoj podgotovki budushhih pedagogov [Conceptual approaches of improving the psychological training of future teachers]. In L.A. Baykova, N.A. Fomina, A.N. Sukhov (Eds.), Proceedings from PPRDCS PNIIE’ 15: VII Мezhdunarodnaja nauchno-prakticheskaja konferencija «Pedagogika i psihologija kak resurs razvitija sovremennogo obshhestva: problemy setevogo vzaimodejstvija v inkljuzivnom obrazovanii» – The 7th International Scientific and Practical Conferences “Pedagogy and Psychology as a Resource of the Development of Contemporary Society: Problems of Network Interaction in Inclusive Education” (Ryazan, October, 8–10th, 2015) (pp. 238–243). Rjazan: Rjazanskij gosudarstvennyj universitet imeni S.A. Esenina [in Russian].
Kalmykova, L.О. (2016). Rozvytok komunikatyvnoi osobystosti v umovakh smyslovoi vzaiemodii [The Development of Communicative Person in Conditions of Semantic Interaction]. Pereyaslav-Khmelnitskyi: Vydavnychyj Dim “Slovo” [in Ukrainian].
Kihlstrom, J.F., & Cantor, N. (2017). Social Intelligence. In R.J. Sternberg & S.B. Kaufnan (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence (Chapter 28, pp. 564–581). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511977244.029
Kim, S., Yoon, M., Kim, W., Lee, S., & Kang, E. (2012). Neural Correlates of Bridging Inferences and Coherence Processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 41(4), 311–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-011-9185-z
Kudryavtseva, N.A. (1995). Edinstvo intellekta [The Unity of the Intelligence]. St. Petersburg [in Russian].
Rubskyi, V.M. (2019). Communication levels of the individuals. Topical Issues of Philosophical Anthropology, 16, 24–32. https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i16.150217
Snyder, М. (2016). Oprosnik sposobnosti k upravleniju samoprezentacii v obshhenii [Questionnaire to Diagnostic the Ability to Manage Self-Presentation in the Process of Communication]. URL: https://www.google.com/url.kspu.edu [in Russian].
Tillman, R., & Louwerse, M. (2018). Estimating Emotions Through Language Statistics and Embodied Cognition. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 47(1), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-017-9522-y
Zasekina, L.V. (2006). Strukturno-funktsionalna orhanizatsiia intelektu osobystosti [Structural-functional organization of intelligence of the person]. Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Abstract views: 98 PDF Downloads: 55
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.