Are the Mental State Verbs Important For Roma Children’s Understanding of False Belief Task
Abstract
Objectives. The aim of the paper is to analyze the process of acquisition of mental state verbs in Romani and in Bulgarian langauges simultaneously by bilingual Roma children. The mental state verbs help the children to understand the Fals Belief Tasks, which predict the Theory of Mind. The theory of mind from other side is important for understanding the intentions, desires, jokes, motivations of others and what are the factors influencing the development of theory of mind
Research methods and techniques. Two Roma children from Bulgaria (1 boy and 1 girl) aged 1;0 – 3;0 years were audiorecorded longitudinally in their natural home environment. According to M. Taumoepeau and T. Ruffman (2006), the mental state verbs can be grouped in different categories, showing different states: mental states, physical states, emotions, perception and cognition. The acquired verbs are analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively.
Results. The data shows that some mental state verbs are acquired in Romani and others in Bulgarian. The factors influencing the acquisition of part of the verbs in Romani and the other part in Bulgarian are analyzed. Mental state verbs are important for the cognitive development of the children. The results show that the the boy uses 100% Romani mental state verbs: very high number of verbs are related to (1) mental states, e.g.: mangav (want), dehav (love), arakhav (care about), džanav (know); (2) emotions: xavxoli (angry), khanile (feeling bad); (3) physical state, e.g.: dukhal (hurt), rovav (cry); (4) sense, such as: dikh (look). The girl uses 89.0% mental state verbs in Romani and 19.0% in Bulgarian language. The learned verbs by her are related to mental state from Romani: mangav (want), džanav (know), darav (be afraid) and from Bulgarian: obicham (love), znam (know), iskam (want). The other verbs from the field of emotions, physical state and sense are from Romani.
Conclusions. The resreach although limited has shown that sentences with mental state verbs in a combination with a noun phrase in a simple sentence are acquired around the age of 1;6. The more complex sentences with mental state verb and complementizer phrase are acquired around the age of 2;6 years old.
Downloads
References
Astington, J.W. (1998). Theory of mind goes to school. Educational Leadership, 56(3), 46–48.
Astington, J.W., & Jenkins, J.M. (1999). A longitudinal study of the relation between language and theory-of-mind development. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1311–1320. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.35.5.1311
Booth, J., Hall, W., Robison, G., & Kim, S. (1997). Acquisition of the mental state verb know by 2- to 5-year-old children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26(6), 581–603. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025093906884
Gopnik, A., & Astington, J. (1988). Children’s Understanding of Representational Change and Its Relation to the Understanding of False Belief and the Appearance-Reality Distinction. Child Development, 59(1), 26–37. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130386
Howard, A., Mayeux, L., & Naigles, L. (2008). Conversational correlates of children’s acquisition of mental verbs and a theory of mind. First Language, 28(4), 375–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723708091044
Kyuchukov, H. (2010). Cognitive development and theory of mind in bilingual children. In B. Bokus (Ed.), Studies in the Psychology of Language and Communication (pp. 211–225). Warsaw: Matrix.
Nixon, S. (2005). Mental state verb production and sentential complements in four-year-old children. First Language, 21(1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723705046898
Perner, J. et al. (1987). Three-year olds’ difficulty with false belief: The case for a conceptual deficit. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5, 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1987.tb01048.x
Perner, J. et al. (2002). Theory of mind finds Piagetian perspective: Why alternative naming comes with understanding belief. Cognitive Development, 17, 1451–1472. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(02)00127-2
Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and brain sciences, 1(4), 515–526. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00076512
Ruffman, T. (2014). To belief or not belief: Children’s theory of mind. Developmental Review, 34(3), 265–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2014.04.001
Shatz, M., Wellman, H., & Silber, Sh. (1983). The acquisition of mental verbs: A systematic investigation of the first reference to mental state. Cognition, 14, 301–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(83)90008-2
Taumoepeau, M., & Ruffman, T. (2006). Mother and infant talk about mental states relates to desire language and emotion understanding. Child Development, 77(2), 465–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00882.x
Villiers de, J. (2007). The interface of language and Theory of Mind. Lingua, 117(11), 1858–1878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.11.006
Villiers de, J.G., & Pyers, J. (1997) Complementing cognition: the relationship between language and theory of mind. In Proceedings of the 21st annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Wimmer, H. & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5
Abstract views: 505 PDF Downloads: 251
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
International Conference Website
